First Futures Broker Review

　　

First Futures 2025 Review: Everything You Need to Know

　　

Executive Summary

　　This first futures review provides a comprehensive assessment of First Futures, a China-based brokerage firm established in 1995 and headquartered in Tianjin. The company specializes in futures and margin trading services, operating under Chinese financial regulatory oversight since its inception. First Futures received approval for futures investment consulting services in 2012, expanding its service portfolio significantly.

　　The broker offers multiple trading platforms including Midas, Q7, Yijiantong, and Shandianshou, catering primarily to investors focused on futures and margin trading. According to available employee satisfaction data, Futures First maintains a solid 4.0/5 rating based on 875 employee reviews, indicating reasonable internal operational standards. However, our evaluation reveals a neutral overall assessment due to limited transparency regarding specific trading conditions, account requirements, and detailed fee structures.

　　The primary user base consists of investors seeking exposure to futures markets and margin trading opportunities, particularly those comfortable with Chinese regulatory frameworks. While the company demonstrates regulatory compliance and platform diversity, potential clients should note the limited availability of comprehensive trading condition information in public domains.

　　

Important Disclaimers

　　Due to First Futures' registration and primary operations in China, the company operates under Chinese financial regulatory requirements, which may differ significantly from international brokerage standards and regulations. Potential clients from other jurisdictions should carefully consider these regulatory differences and their implications for trading activities and investor protections.

　　This evaluation is based on publicly available information, user feedback, and company-provided data. Given the limited detailed information available regarding specific trading conditions, fees, and account requirements, prospective clients are strongly advised to conduct direct inquiries with the company to obtain comprehensive and current information before making any trading decisions.

　　

Rating Framework

Evaluation Criteria	Score	Rating Basis
Account Conditions	N/A	Insufficient detailed information available in source materials
Tools and Resources	8/10	Multiple trading platforms available (Midas, Q7, Yijiantong, Shandianshou) with various asset classes
Customer Service and Support	7/10	High employee satisfaction ratings, though specific customer service experience details not comprehensively documented
Trading Experience	N/A	Specific trading experience information not detailed in available materials
Trust and Reliability	8/10	Regulated by Chinese financial authorities with established operational history since 1995
User Experience	6/10	Work-life balance rating of 2.9/5 indicates potential user experience challenges

　　

Broker Overview

　　First Futures established its operations in July 1995, marking nearly three decades of presence in the Chinese financial services sector. The company underwent significant expansion in 2012 when it received regulatory approval for futures investment consulting services, broadening its service capabilities beyond basic trading facilitation. This regulatory milestone positioned First Futures as a comprehensive futures services provider within the Chinese market framework.

　　The company's business model centers on providing futures and margin trading services to individual and institutional clients. Operating from its Tianjin headquarters, First Futures has maintained consistent regulatory compliance with Chinese financial authorities throughout its operational history. The firm's longevity in the market suggests established operational procedures and client relationship management systems, though specific performance metrics remain limited in public disclosure.

　　First Futures distinguishes itself through platform diversity, offering four distinct trading platforms: Midas, Q7, Yijiantong, and Shandianshou. This multi-platform approach caters to varying trader preferences and technical requirements. The company primarily focuses on futures and margin trading asset classes, aligning with its core competency and regulatory approvals. Operating under Chinese financial regulatory oversight, First Futures maintains compliance with local market standards and investor protection requirements, though these may differ from international regulatory frameworks that global traders might expect.

　　

Detailed Information Analysis

　　Regulatory Jurisdiction: First Futures operates under the supervision of Chinese financial regulatory authorities, with its primary registration in Tianjin. This regulatory framework provides oversight specific to the Chinese financial services sector, ensuring compliance with local market standards and investor protection protocols.

　　Deposit and Withdrawal Methods: Specific information regarding deposit and withdrawal methods is not detailed in available source materials. Prospective clients should inquire directly with the company for comprehensive information about funding options and processing procedures.

　　Minimum Deposit Requirements: Minimum deposit requirements are not specified in the available information sources. This represents a significant information gap that potential clients must address through direct communication with First Futures representatives.

　　Bonus and Promotional Offers: Details about bonus structures, promotional offers, or incentive programs are not documented in the source materials. The absence of this information suggests either limited promotional activities or restricted public disclosure policies.

　　Available Trading Assets: The company specializes in futures and margin trading instruments, focusing on these specific asset classes rather than offering a broader multi-asset trading environment. This specialization aligns with the company's regulatory approvals and core competencies.

　　Cost Structure: Comprehensive cost structure information, including spreads, commissions, and fees, is not detailed in available materials. This information gap represents a critical consideration for prospective clients evaluating the economic viability of trading with First Futures.

　　Leverage Ratios: Specific leverage ratio information is not provided in the source materials, representing another significant information gap for potential traders assessing risk management parameters.

　　Platform Options: First Futures supports four distinct trading platforms - Midas, Q7, Yijiantong, and Shandianshou - providing clients with multiple technological options to suit their trading preferences and technical requirements.

　　Geographic Restrictions: Information regarding geographic restrictions or service availability limitations is not specified in available materials.

　　Customer Service Languages: Specific details about customer service language support are not documented in the source materials.

　　

Account Conditions Analysis

　　The evaluation of First Futures' account conditions faces significant limitations due to insufficient detailed information in available source materials. This first futures review cannot provide comprehensive assessment of account types, their specific features, or comparative advantages without access to detailed account specifications. The absence of publicly available information regarding account tier structures, minimum balance requirements, or special account features represents a considerable transparency gap.

　　Account opening procedures, verification requirements, and documentation standards are not detailed in accessible materials. This lack of transparency may indicate either restricted information disclosure policies or limited international market focus. Prospective clients seeking specific account condition information must engage directly with company representatives to obtain comprehensive details about available account options and their respective features.

　　The absence of information regarding specialized account types, such as Islamic accounts or institutional-specific arrangements, further limits the assessment of First Futures' account offering diversity. Without clear account condition documentation, potential clients cannot adequately evaluate whether the broker's account structures align with their specific trading requirements and preferences. This information gap significantly impacts the ability to provide a thorough first futures review of account-related services.

　　

Tools and Resources Analysis

　　First Futures demonstrates notable strength in platform diversity, offering four distinct trading platforms: Midas, Q7, Yijiantong, and Shandianshou. This multi-platform approach provides traders with technological flexibility and the ability to select systems that best match their trading styles and technical preferences. The availability of multiple platforms suggests investment in technological infrastructure and recognition of diverse trader requirements within their client base.

　　However, detailed information regarding the specific capabilities, features, and comparative advantages of each platform is not comprehensively documented in available materials. This limits the ability to assess the quality and sophistication of the trading tools provided. Research and analysis resources, educational materials, and market intelligence offerings are not detailed in accessible information sources, representing significant gaps in understanding the broker's comprehensive service portfolio.

　　Automated trading support, algorithmic trading capabilities, and advanced order management features across the various platforms remain undocumented in available materials. The absence of detailed tool specifications and resource descriptions limits traders' ability to evaluate whether First Futures' technological offerings meet their specific trading requirements. Despite the positive indication of platform diversity, the lack of detailed feature documentation prevents a comprehensive assessment of the tools and resources quality that would typically be expected in a thorough first futures review.

　　

Customer Service and Support Analysis

　　First Futures maintains a 4.0/5 employee satisfaction rating based on 875 employee reviews, suggesting reasonable internal operational standards and workplace satisfaction. This employee satisfaction metric may indirectly indicate positive internal culture and operational efficiency, which could translate to better customer service delivery. However, specific customer service channels, availability hours, and response time metrics are not detailed in available information sources.

　　The absence of documented customer service contact methods, support ticket systems, or live chat availability represents a significant information gap for prospective clients evaluating service accessibility. Multi-language support capabilities, particularly important for international clients, are not specified in available materials. This limitation may indicate primarily domestic market focus or restricted international service provision.

　　Customer service quality assessments, problem resolution case studies, and client satisfaction surveys are not documented in accessible materials. Without specific customer feedback regarding service experiences, response effectiveness, or issue resolution capabilities, this first futures review cannot provide comprehensive evaluation of the actual customer service quality. The disconnect between positive employee satisfaction ratings and limited customer service information availability suggests potential transparency issues that prospective clients should address through direct inquiry with the company.

　　

Trading Experience Analysis

　　The assessment of trading experience at First Futures faces substantial limitations due to insufficient detailed information regarding platform performance, execution quality, and user interface characteristics. Platform stability metrics, order execution speeds, and system uptime statistics are not documented in available source materials, preventing comprehensive evaluation of the technical trading environment quality.

　　Order execution quality, including slippage rates, requote frequencies, and fill rate statistics, remains undocumented across the four available platforms (Midas, Q7, Yijiantong, and Shandianshou). This absence of performance data significantly limits traders' ability to assess the reliability and efficiency of trade execution services. Mobile trading capabilities, cross-platform synchronization, and advanced order management features are not detailed in accessible information.

　　User interface design quality, platform navigation efficiency, and overall usability assessments are not available in the source materials. The lack of specific user feedback regarding trading experience, platform functionality, or technical performance prevents thorough evaluation of the actual trading environment quality. Without comprehensive trading experience documentation, this first futures review cannot adequately assess whether the broker provides competitive trading conditions that meet modern trader expectations and requirements.

　　

Trust and Reliability Analysis

　　First Futures operates under Chinese financial regulatory oversight, providing a foundation of regulatory compliance and institutional accountability. The company's establishment in 1995 and subsequent regulatory approval for futures investment consulting services in 2012 demonstrates sustained regulatory relationship and compliance history. This regulatory framework provides oversight mechanisms specific to the Chinese financial services sector, ensuring adherence to local market standards and investor protection protocols.

　　The company's nearly three-decade operational history suggests institutional stability and sustained business viability within the Chinese financial services market. However, specific information regarding capital adequacy, client fund segregation policies, and investor protection mechanisms is not detailed in available materials. The absence of documented negative regulatory actions or significant compliance issues in accessible information sources provides some positive indication regarding regulatory standing.

　　Third-party ratings, industry recognition, or independent audit results are not documented in available materials, limiting the ability to assess external validation of the company's operational standards. Client fund safety measures, insurance coverage, and dispute resolution procedures are not comprehensively detailed in accessible information sources. While regulatory oversight provides baseline trust indicators, the limited transparency regarding specific investor protection measures represents a consideration for prospective clients evaluating the safety and reliability aspects covered in this first futures review.

　　

User Experience Analysis

　　User experience evaluation reveals mixed indicators regarding First Futures' operational environment. While employee satisfaction maintains a solid 4.0/5 rating, the work-life balance score of 2.9/5 suggests potential operational intensity that could impact service delivery quality. This disparity between overall satisfaction and work-life balance may indicate high-pressure operational environments that could influence customer service consistency and staff retention.

　　Interface design quality, platform navigation efficiency, and overall system usability are not documented in available materials, preventing comprehensive assessment of the user interaction experience. Registration procedures, account verification processes, and initial setup experiences are not detailed in accessible information sources. This absence of user journey documentation limits understanding of the client onboarding experience and potential friction points.

　　Funding operation experiences, withdrawal processing efficiency, and transaction management capabilities are not specified in available materials. Common user complaints, recurring issues, or frequently reported challenges are not documented in accessible information sources. The target user profile appears focused on investors specifically seeking futures and margin trading opportunities, particularly those comfortable operating within Chinese regulatory frameworks. However, without comprehensive user experience feedback and detailed process documentation, this first futures review cannot provide thorough evaluation of the actual client experience quality and operational efficiency.

　　

Conclusion

　　This first futures review concludes that First Futures represents a regulated, established brokerage firm with nearly three decades of operational history in the Chinese financial services sector. The company offers platform diversity through four distinct trading systems and maintains regulatory compliance with Chinese financial authorities. However, significant information transparency gaps regarding account conditions, trading costs, and detailed service specifications limit comprehensive evaluation.

　　First Futures appears most suitable for investors specifically seeking futures and margin trading services within the Chinese regulatory framework, particularly those comfortable with limited public information disclosure and willing to engage directly with the company for detailed service specifications. The broker's strengths include regulatory oversight, operational longevity, and platform variety, while weaknesses encompass limited transparency regarding account conditions, cost structures, and comprehensive user experience documentation.

　　Prospective clients should conduct thorough direct inquiries with First Futures representatives to obtain detailed information about trading conditions, account requirements, and service specifications before making trading decisions. The mixed employee satisfaction indicators and limited public information availability suggest the need for careful due diligence when evaluating this broker for trading activities.