Search

EAF Forex Broker provides real users with * positive reviews, 1 neutral reviews and 3 exposure review!

EAF Broker Review

7.88

WikiFX monitor

Risk Control

Global public opinion

Software Index

No software

EAF Review 4

Latest All(4) Neutral(1) Exposure(3)
Neutral

Support was quick and precise in giving a direct guidance to resolving the issue of my hanging deposit. Although I missed a trade due to the hanging deposit and expect them to ensure a faster and total completion of deposit transactions next time.

Harkerri
2024-08-26
Exposure
EAF international futures fraud.

around april 2022, i passed a customer service person who claimed to be wen yunqi. said they were orient securities futures agents EAF international develops international futures in the mainland, and at the same time has EAF international power of attorney and the business license of orient securities futures company, so i opened a sub-account. this account was unable to log in at the beginning of march, and there was still 572 us dollars in the account.

FX2288671286
2023-03-24
Exposure
EAF International Future fraud

About April 2022, I passed a customer service person who claimed to be Wen Yunqi with phone number 13641934806. They said that they were the agent of EAF Futures to carry out international futures in the mainland, and they had the power of attorney of East Asia International and the business license of EAF Company, so I opened a sub-account, which was in early March and could not be logged in. It also has $572 in its account.

FX2288671286
2023-03-24
Exposure
Scam

In this early May, someone added me and pulled me into a group. Then the assistant in the group sent the link of livestreaming room, in which teachers gave recommendation on stocks. Since it was for free, I had a listen for skill improving. Later, the teacher asked us to trade on EAF , saying that the stock market was volatile. So the members got registered under the guidance of the manager. They showed the profit screenshots with several thousand profit. Chen asked us to join his team. We were divided into different groups by our initial fund. Members continued to show the profits. On May 12, I inquired the members and they all told me to rest assured. So I deposited 50 thousand. Having profited a lot, I added fund, bringing the total to 150 thousand. I wanted to recovery losses, while the market went adversely. My account became liquidated directly. Chen comforted me and asked for fund adding to recover losses. Sp I trusted him again. On 27 and 28, I still suffered losses under his guidance. Then they claimed that my fund is small. To ensure the account security, I brought the total into 450 thousand. Once, Chen gave recommendation on stock, preaching the coming opportunity. I placed nearly 10-lot orders, ending up losing all fund. At that time, I realized that I had been cheated.

龙天锋法务先锋
2020-08-12

  

EAF 2025 Review: Everything You Need to Know

  

Executive Summary

  This eaf review looks at a regulated forex broker that keeps certain reliability standards but lacks complete trading condition information. EAF operates under CFFEX regulation and gives traders access to multiple asset classes including commodities, indices, futures, and bonds. The broker targets traders who want diversified asset investment opportunities within a regulated environment.

  EAF started as Eaf Customs Brokerage Services Inc. in July 2013 and has operated for about 11 years with its registration base in New York. While the regulatory oversight from CFFEX provides a foundation of trust, the limited availability of detailed trading specifications and user experience data creates challenges for complete evaluation.

  The broker appears most suitable for traders who value regulatory compliance and asset diversification over detailed cost transparency. However, potential clients should know that specific information about trading conditions, customer support quality, and platform features remains limited in available documentation.

  

Important Notice

  When considering EAF's services, traders should note that the CFFEX regulatory framework may have different applicability and service provisions for traders in different geographical regions. The regulatory scope and investor protection measures may differ based on your location and trading jurisdiction.

  This evaluation is based on official EAF information and general market feedback rather than personal user experience. Prospective clients should conduct their own research and verify current trading conditions directly with the broker before making investment decisions.

  

Rating Framework

Dimension Score Rating Basis
Account Conditions N/A Specific account condition information not provided in available materials
Tools and Resources 6/10 Offers commodities, indices, futures, and bonds trading but lacks detailed tool specifications
Customer Service and Support N/A Insufficient customer service information available
Trading Experience N/A Trading experience details not specified in available documentation
Trust and Reliability 8/10 CFFEX regulation provides solid trust foundation
User Experience N/A User experience information not detailed in available materials

  

Broker Overview

  EAF emerged in the financial services sector on July 10, 2013, when Eaf Customs Brokerage Services Inc. was officially established. Based in New York, the company has built about 11 years of operational history in the financial markets. The broker positions itself as a regulated entity that focuses on diversified asset trading opportunities for its client base.

  The company's business model centers on providing access to multiple asset classes rather than specializing in traditional forex pairs alone. This eaf review reveals that the broker's primary service offering includes commodities, indices, futures, and bonds trading. The regulatory oversight from CFFEX provides the institutional framework within which EAF operates, ensuring compliance with applicable financial regulations and standards.

  While the specific trading platform technology remains unclear in available documentation, the broker's asset diversification strategy suggests a focus on serving traders who seek exposure beyond conventional currency markets. The CFFEX regulatory backing represents the primary trust anchor for the broker's operations and client relationships.

  

Detailed Information

  Regulatory Jurisdiction: EAF operates under CFFEX supervision, providing regulatory compliance for traders within the applicable jurisdictional framework. The specific scope of this regulation may vary for different regional markets.

  Deposit and Withdrawal Methods: Available documentation does not specify the deposit and withdrawal options supported by EAF, requiring direct broker contact for current payment processing information.

  Minimum Deposit Requirements: Specific minimum deposit thresholds are not detailed in accessible materials, necessitating direct inquiry with the broker for current account opening requirements.

  Promotional Offers: Information about bonus structures or promotional campaigns is not available in current documentation.

  Tradeable Assets: The broker provides access to commodities, indices, futures, and bonds markets, offering diversification beyond traditional forex instruments.

  Cost Structure: This eaf review finds that specific information about spreads, commissions, and other trading costs is not detailed in available materials, requiring direct verification with the broker.

  Leverage Ratios: Leverage specifications are not provided in accessible documentation.

  Platform Options: Trading platform details and technology specifications are not specified in available materials.

  Geographic Restrictions: Regional limitations and availability are not detailed in current documentation.

  Customer Support Languages: Supported languages for customer service are not specified in available information.

  

Detailed Rating Analysis

  

Account Conditions Analysis

  The evaluation of EAF's account conditions faces significant limitations due to insufficient available information. Standard account evaluation criteria including account type varieties, minimum deposit requirements, and opening procedures cannot be assessed based on current documentation.

  Without specific details about different account tiers or their respective features, this eaf review cannot provide clear guidance on account suitability for different trader profiles. The absence of information about specialized account options, such as Islamic accounts for Sharia-compliant trading, further limits the assessment scope.

  Potential clients who want detailed account condition information would need to engage directly with EAF representatives to understand current offerings, requirements, and account features. The lack of transparent account specification documentation represents a significant information gap that may impact trader decision-making processes.

  The account opening process timeline, verification requirements, and documentation needs remain unspecified in available materials, requiring direct broker consultation for accurate current procedures.

  

Tools and Resources Analysis

  EAF's tools and resources offering centers on asset class diversity, providing access to commodities, indices, futures, and bonds trading. However, the specific trading tools, analytical resources, and research support available to clients lack detailed documentation in accessible materials.

  The broker's multi-asset approach suggests potential for portfolio diversification, but without detailed tool specifications, traders cannot assess the quality and comprehensiveness of available trading instruments. Research and analysis resources, which are crucial for informed trading decisions, are not detailed in current documentation.

  Educational resources and learning materials availability remains unspecified, limiting assessment of the broker's support for trader development and skill enhancement. Automated trading support, expert advisors compatibility, and algorithmic trading capabilities are not addressed in available information.

  The absence of detailed tool specifications and resource descriptions represents a significant limitation for traders who prioritize comprehensive analytical support and educational materials in their broker selection process.

  

Customer Service and Support Analysis

  Customer service evaluation for EAF encounters substantial limitations due to insufficient available information about support channels, availability, and service quality standards. Standard customer service assessment criteria including contact methods, response times, and support hours cannot be evaluated based on current documentation.

  The availability of multiple communication channels such as live chat, email support, phone assistance, and social media presence remains unspecified. Response time expectations and service level agreements are not detailed in accessible materials, limiting assessment of support efficiency and reliability.

  Multi-language support capabilities, which are crucial for international traders, are not documented in available information. The geographic coverage of customer support services and regional support availability also lack specification.

  Without user feedback or documented service quality metrics, this evaluation cannot provide insights into actual customer service performance or problem resolution effectiveness. Prospective clients would need to test support responsiveness and quality through direct interaction before committing to the broker's services.

  

Trading Experience Analysis

  The assessment of EAF's trading experience faces significant challenges due to limited available information about platform performance, execution quality, and user interface design. Critical trading experience factors including platform stability, execution speed, and order processing efficiency lack documentation in accessible materials.

  Platform functionality completeness, advanced trading features, and customization options remain unspecified, preventing complete evaluation of the trading environment quality. Mobile trading capabilities and cross-device synchronization features are not detailed in current documentation.

  Order execution quality metrics, slippage rates, and requote frequency data are not available for analysis. The trading environment characteristics, including market depth visibility and price transparency, lack specification in accessible materials.

  This eaf review cannot provide clear insights into the actual trading experience quality without user feedback, performance data, or detailed platform specifications. Traders who prioritize execution quality and platform sophistication would need to evaluate these aspects through demo accounts or direct testing.

  

Trust and Reliability Analysis

  EAF's trust and reliability assessment centers primarily on its CFFEX regulatory status, which provides the foundation for institutional credibility. The regulatory oversight represents the primary trust anchor for the broker's operations, though specific regulatory license numbers and compliance details are not detailed in available documentation.

  Client fund protection measures, segregated account policies, and deposit insurance coverage remain unspecified in accessible materials. The transparency of company financial reporting and operational disclosure practices cannot be assessed based on current documentation.

  Industry reputation and peer recognition information is not available for evaluation, limiting assessment of the broker's standing within the financial services community. Historical performance data and negative event handling procedures are not documented in accessible materials.

  While CFFEX regulation provides a regulatory framework, the specific investor protection measures and dispute resolution mechanisms available to clients require direct verification with the broker. The limited transparency about operational details may impact some traders' confidence levels.

  

User Experience Analysis

  User experience evaluation for EAF encounters substantial limitations due to insufficient available information about client satisfaction, interface design, and operational procedures. Overall user satisfaction metrics and client retention rates are not available for analysis in current documentation.

  Registration and account verification processes, including timeline expectations and documentation requirements, remain unspecified in accessible materials. The user interface design quality and platform navigation efficiency cannot be assessed without detailed platform information.

  Funding and withdrawal experience quality, including processing times and transaction efficiency, lacks documentation in available materials. Common user complaints or satisfaction areas are not detailed in accessible information.

  Without user feedback data, satisfaction surveys, or experience testimonials, this evaluation cannot provide insights into actual user experience quality. Prospective clients would need to assess user experience aspects through direct engagement and testing of the broker's services and platforms.

  

Conclusion

  This eaf review reveals a regulated forex broker operating under CFFEX oversight with a focus on multi-asset trading opportunities. EAF appears suitable for traders who prioritize regulatory compliance and asset diversification, particularly those seeking exposure to commodities, indices, futures, and bonds beyond traditional forex markets.

  The broker's primary strengths lie in its regulatory backing and asset class variety, providing a foundation for traders seeking diversified investment opportunities within a regulated framework. However, significant limitations exist in the availability of detailed trading conditions, cost structures, and user experience information.

  EAF may be most appropriate for experienced traders who can conduct thorough research and are comfortable with limited transparency about specific trading terms. The broker's suitability for retail traders seeking complete information and support may be limited by the current lack of detailed operational transparency.

EAF review