Regarding the legitimacy of GGPM forex brokers, it provides FSPR and WikiBit, .
Business
License
The regulatory license is the strongest proof.
FSPR Financial Service Corporate
Financial Service Providers Register
Financial Service Providers Register
Current Status:
License Type:
Financial Service CorporateLicensed Entity:
Effective Date:
2017-11-03Email Address of Licensed Institution:
goldmountain79@outlook.com53748:
No SharingWebsite of Licensed Institution:
--Expiration Time:
2022-05-12Address of Licensed Institution:
Phone Number of Licensed Institution:
07 837 3819Licensed Institution Certified Documents:
Ggpm, a broker based in New Zealand, has been operating since 2017 and primarily focuses on forex trading. As the forex market is rife with both legitimate opportunities and potential scams, it is crucial for traders to conduct thorough evaluations of brokers before committing their funds. The importance of this evaluation cannot be overstated, as the wrong choice can lead to significant financial losses. This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of Ggpm's safety, legitimacy, and overall trading conditions. Our investigation draws on multiple sources, including regulatory databases, customer reviews, and industry reports, to create a well-rounded assessment framework.
The regulatory status of a broker is one of the most significant factors influencing its safety and legitimacy. In the case of Ggpm, its regulatory information raises several red flags that potential traders should consider. Ggpm claims to be registered with the Financial Service Providers Register (FSPR) in New Zealand, but this registration does not guarantee the same level of protection as brokers regulated by top-tier authorities. Below is a summary of Ggpm's regulatory information:
Regulatory Body | License Number | Regulatory Region | Verification Status |
---|---|---|---|
FSPR | 580547 | New Zealand | Suspicious Clone |
NFA | 0510057 | United States | Unauthorized |
The FSPR is a relatively lenient regulatory body, and many brokers operating under it may not adhere to stringent compliance standards. Furthermore, Ggpm's low score of 1.98 on WikiFX, a platform that evaluates brokers, indicates a lack of trustworthiness. While no negative regulatory disclosures have been found, the absence of a robust regulatory framework raises questions about the broker's legitimacy and operational practices. Therefore, when evaluating if Ggpm is safe, it is essential to consider the implications of its regulatory status.
Ggpm was established in 2017, and its operational history is relatively short compared to more established brokers. The ownership structure of Ggpm is somewhat opaque, with limited information available about its management team. A thorough background check reveals that the company operates under two entities: Golden Stones Business Limited and Golden Grand Global Holding Limited. However, details regarding the qualifications and experience of the management team are scarce, which makes it challenging to assess their capability in managing a financial service.
Transparency is another area of concern; Ggpm does not provide comprehensive information about its operational practices or financial health. This lack of clarity can be a potential warning sign for traders. A well-established broker typically offers detailed insights into its operations, including financial reports and management backgrounds. Therefore, when asking if Ggpm is safe, the company's transparency and the limited information available about its leadership should be significant considerations for potential investors.
Understanding the trading conditions offered by Ggpm is essential for evaluating its overall safety and reliability. Ggpm primarily uses the MetaTrader 4 (MT4) platform, which is known for its user-friendly interface and robust trading features. However, the broker's fee structure raises some concerns. Ggpm does not provide clear information about its spreads, commissions, and other trading costs, which can lead to confusion among traders. Below is a comparative table of Ggpm's core trading costs:
Fee Type | Ggpm | Industry Average |
---|---|---|
Major Currency Pair Spread | Unknown | 1.0 - 2.0 pips |
Commission Model | Not Clear | $3 - $7 per lot |
Overnight Interest Range | Unknown | Varies by broker |
The lack of transparency regarding fees can be a red flag, as it may indicate hidden costs that could affect trading profitability. Moreover, traders should be cautious if a broker's fee structure appears significantly lower than industry averages, as this could be a tactic to attract clients while imposing unfavorable conditions later. Hence, the absence of clarity around trading costs raises questions about whether Ggpm is safe for trading.
The safety of client funds is paramount in any trading environment. Ggpm claims to have measures in place to protect client funds, but details on these measures are not readily available. The broker does not appear to offer features such as segregated accounts, which are essential for ensuring that client funds are kept separate from the broker's operational funds.
Additionally, there is no mention of investor protection schemes or negative balance protection, both of which are critical for safeguarding traders in volatile markets. Historical issues related to fund safety have not been reported for Ggpm, but the lack of robust safety measures raises concerns. When assessing whether Ggpm is safe, the absence of clear information on fund protection policies is a significant factor that should not be overlooked.
Customer feedback is an invaluable resource for assessing the reliability of a broker. Reviews for Ggpm are mixed, with some users praising its platform while others express dissatisfaction with customer service and withdrawal processes. Common complaints include slow response times and difficulties in withdrawing funds. Below is a summary of the primary complaint types:
Complaint Type | Severity Level | Company Response |
---|---|---|
Withdrawal Issues | High | Slow to respond |
Customer Support | Medium | Average |
Trading Platform Bugs | Low | Limited updates |
Two notable cases highlight these issues. One user reported being unable to withdraw funds for over a month, leading to frustration and loss of trust in the broker. Another complained about a lack of support when facing technical issues on the trading platform. These patterns of complaints suggest that while Ggpm may have some redeeming qualities, its customer service and withdrawal processes require improvement. Therefore, when asking if Ggpm is safe, the customer experience, particularly regarding complaints, cannot be ignored.
The trading platform is a critical component of the trading experience. Ggpm uses the well-regarded MetaTrader 4 platform, which is known for its reliability and features. However, the overall performance of the platform has received mixed reviews. Users have reported issues with order execution quality, including slippage and occasional rejections of orders.
The execution speed is generally acceptable, but the reported instances of slippage can be concerning, particularly in fast-moving markets. The absence of any apparent manipulation or irregularities in platform performance is a positive sign, but potential traders should remain vigilant. Thus, when evaluating if Ggpm is safe, the quality of order execution and the platform's reliability are crucial factors to consider.
Using Ggpm carries several risks that traders should be aware of. The overall risk profile can be summarized in the following table:
Risk Category | Risk Level | Brief Description |
---|---|---|
Regulatory Risk | High | Lack of robust regulation increases potential fraud. |
Fund Safety Risk | Medium | Insufficient information on fund protection measures. |
Customer Service Risk | Medium | Complaints about slow response times and withdrawal issues. |
Platform Risk | Medium | Reports of slippage and order rejections. |
To mitigate these risks, potential traders should consider starting with a small investment to test the broker's reliability. Additionally, conducting regular reviews and staying informed about any changes in the broker's regulatory status can help manage risks effectively.
In conclusion, while Ggpm presents itself as a viable option for forex trading, several concerning factors suggest that traders should proceed with caution. The lack of robust regulation, transparency issues, and mixed customer feedback raise questions about the broker's overall safety. Potential traders should be wary of the risks involved and consider alternatives that offer stronger regulatory oversight and clearer trading conditions.
For those seeking safer trading environments, brokers regulated by top-tier authorities such as the FCA or ASIC may be more reliable options. Overall, while Ggpm may not be outright fraudulent, its safety profile is questionable, and traders are advised to carefully evaluate their options before investing.
Whether it is a legitimate broker to see if the market is regulated; start investing in Forex App whether it is safe or a scam, check whether there is a license.
GGPM latest industry rating score is 1.60, the higher the score the safer it is out of 10, the more regulatory licenses the more legitimate it is. 1.60 If the score is too low, there is a risk of being scammed, please pay attention to the choice to avoid.