Regarding the legitimacy of CAMBRIDGE forex brokers, it provides FSPR and WikiBit, .
Business
License
The regulatory license is the strongest proof.
FSPR Financial Service Corporate
Financial Service Providers Register
Financial Service Providers Register
Current Status:
License Type:
Financial Service CorporateLicensed Entity:
Effective Date:
2017-01-11Email Address of Licensed Institution:
shengjunwang@yahoo.com53748:
No SharingWebsite of Licensed Institution:
--Expiration Time:
2019-09-26Address of Licensed Institution:
Phone Number of Licensed Institution:
094492502Licensed Institution Certified Documents:
Cambridge Asset Management positions itself as a significant player in the forex market, offering a variety of trading options across multiple financial instruments. As online trading continues to grow, traders must exercise caution when selecting a broker, as the risk of scams and untrustworthy platforms is ever-present. This article aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of Cambridge Asset Management, focusing on its regulatory status, company background, trading conditions, customer safety, and user experience. Our analysis is based on data collected from various reputable sources, including regulatory databases, customer reviews, and industry reports.
Regulation is a critical factor in determining a broker's trustworthiness. A well-regulated broker is subject to strict oversight, which can provide traders with a layer of security. In the case of Cambridge Asset Management, it is essential to assess its regulatory standing.
Regulatory Body | License Number | Regulatory Region | Verification Status |
---|---|---|---|
Not disclosed | N/A | N/A | Unverified |
As indicated in the table, Cambridge Asset Management lacks transparency regarding its regulatory status. It is not overseen by a recognized financial authority, which raises concerns about its legitimacy. Regulatory bodies such as the FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) in the UK and ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) are known for strict compliance standards. The absence of regulation by such bodies suggests that traders should be cautious and consider the potential risks associated with trading through Cambridge Asset Management.
Understanding a company's history and ownership structure is vital in assessing its reliability. Cambridge Asset Management claims to have been operational for several years, but detailed information about its founding, ownership, and management team is sparse. The lack of transparency regarding its corporate structure and the experience of its management team further raises questions about its credibility.
While the company asserts that it has a global presence and a significant trading volume, the absence of verifiable data makes it difficult to assess its actual standing in the market. A robust management team with a proven track record is essential for any reputable broker, and the lack of information in this area is concerning for potential clients.
When evaluating a forex broker, understanding the trading conditions, including fees and commissions, is crucial. Cambridge Asset Management claims to offer competitive trading conditions; however, the specifics are not readily available.
Fee Type | Cambridge Asset Management | Industry Average |
---|---|---|
Major Currency Pair Spread | Not disclosed | 1-2 pips |
Commission Model | Not disclosed | Varies |
Overnight Interest Range | Not disclosed | 0.5%-1.5% |
The absence of clear information regarding the fee structure raises red flags. Traders should be wary of brokers that do not provide transparent pricing models, as hidden fees can significantly impact profitability. The lack of disclosure regarding spreads, commissions, and overnight interest rates is a common tactic used by less reputable brokers, making it essential for traders to proceed with caution.
The safety of client funds is paramount when choosing a broker. Cambridge Asset Management claims to implement various security measures to protect client funds, but specific details are lacking.
The broker's website mentions security protocols like fund segregation and encryption, but without regulatory oversight, the effectiveness of these measures remains unverified. The absence of negative balance protection policies also raises concerns, as traders could potentially lose more than their initial investment. Historical issues related to fund security could further complicate matters, making it essential for traders to be vigilant.
Customer feedback provides valuable insights into a broker's reliability. A review of customer experiences with Cambridge Asset Management reveals a mixed bag of opinions. Some users report positive experiences, citing responsive customer support and a user-friendly platform. However, common complaints include withdrawal delays and unresponsive customer service during critical times.
Complaint Type | Severity Level | Company Response |
---|---|---|
Withdrawal Issues | High | Slow responses |
Account Verification | Medium | Inconsistent |
Platform Stability | Medium | Average |
Two notable cases involve clients who experienced significant delays in fund withdrawals, leading to frustration and distrust. Such issues highlight the importance of a broker's responsiveness and reliability, particularly during critical trading moments.
The trading platform's performance is a key aspect of the overall trading experience. Cambridge Asset Management offers a platform that is reportedly user-friendly and accessible across various devices. However, there have been mentions of issues related to order execution, including slippage and occasional rejections.
Traders must be cautious of platforms that exhibit signs of manipulation, such as frequent slippage during volatile market conditions. The quality of trade execution can significantly affect a trader's profitability, making it essential to ensure that the broker provides a reliable and transparent trading environment.
Using Cambridge Asset Management presents several risks that potential traders should consider.
Risk Category | Risk Level | Brief Description |
---|---|---|
Regulatory Risk | High | Unregulated status raises significant concerns. |
Financial Risk | Medium | Lack of transparency regarding fees and conditions. |
Operational Risk | Medium | Customer complaints about withdrawal issues. |
Traders should mitigate these risks by conducting thorough research before committing their funds. It is advisable to start with a smaller investment to gauge the broker's reliability before increasing exposure.
In conclusion, while Cambridge Asset Management presents itself as a viable option for forex trading, IS Cambridge safe? The lack of regulatory oversight, transparency regarding fees, and mixed customer reviews suggest that potential traders should exercise caution. There are indications of possible fraud, especially given the absence of verifiable information about the company's legitimacy.
For traders seeking reliable alternatives, it is recommended to consider brokers regulated by top-tier authorities, such as the FCA or ASIC. These brokers typically offer better security, transparency, and customer service. Overall, potential clients should weigh their options carefully and prioritize safety and reliability when choosing a forex broker.
Whether it is a legitimate broker to see if the market is regulated; start investing in Forex App whether it is safe or a scam, check whether there is a license.
CAMBRIDGE latest industry rating score is 1.60, the higher the score the safer it is out of 10, the more regulatory licenses the more legitimate it is. 1.60 If the score is too low, there is a risk of being scammed, please pay attention to the choice to avoid.