KAWASE Review 1
Its routine is to give no access to withdrawal with grinding excuses. Help.












KAWASE Forex Broker provides real users with * positive reviews, * neutral reviews and 1 exposure review!
Business
License
Its routine is to give no access to withdrawal with grinding excuses. Help.
Kawase now operates as Fondex. This Kawase review shows a broker that has changed a lot, including switching its name to Fondex and serving international traders since 2011. Forex Peace Army listed Kawase as a CFD broker with 5 reviews, but the platform is now marked as "out of business" under its original name. The broker started with values of honor, fairness, determination, flexibility, and simplicity to help traders who wanted clear trading conditions.
The platform offered many asset types including currencies, precious metals, stocks, indices, and oil. This made it good for traders who wanted to spread their investments across different markets. Customer service reviews were on Trustpilot, which showed some user activity and feedback collection. However, detailed information about trading conditions, regulatory status, and current operations remains limited in public sources, making this review very important for potential users thinking about the platform.
This Kawase review uses information from various sources, including Forex Peace Army and Trustpilot reviews. Since Kawase has reportedly changed to operating as Fondex, potential users should check current operational status and regulatory compliance in their areas. The broker's regulatory information was not detailed in available sources, so investors need to verify licensing and oversight authorities relevant to their trading location on their own.
Our evaluation method relies on publicly available information and user feedback where we can access it. Due to limited detailed data availability, some parts of this review may need updates as more current information becomes available.
Based on available information, here are our ratings for Kawase across six key areas:
Dimension | Score | Basis |
---|---|---|
Account Conditions | 6/10 | Limited information available about account types and requirements |
Tools and Resources | 5/10 | Basic asset coverage mentioned, detailed tools not specified |
Customer Service | 7/10 | Trustpilot reviews indicate customer service presence |
Trading Experience | 6/10 | Platform details not comprehensively documented |
Trust and Regulation | 4/10 | Regulatory information not clearly specified in sources |
User Experience | 5/10 | Mixed feedback and limited current operational clarity |
Kawase started in 2011 as an online trading broker that positioned itself as a trusted platform in the Japanese market. The company built its foundation on core values of honor, fairness, determination, flexibility, and simplicity, which guided how it served international CFD traders. As an international CFD broker, Kawase aimed to provide accessible trading solutions while keeping operational principles straightforward.
The broker's business model focused on offering CFD trading across multiple asset classes. This positioned it as a complete trading solution for retail investors. Available information shows the platform served clients seeking exposure to various financial markets through a single trading interface.
Kawase offered trading opportunities across several major asset categories including currencies, precious metals, stocks, indices, and oil. This diverse asset selection showed the broker's intention to serve traders with different investment strategies and risk preferences. However, specific details about trading platforms, regulatory oversight, and operational jurisdictions were not fully documented in available public sources, which represents a significant information gap for this Kawase review.
Available sources do not provide specific information about Kawase's regulatory authorities or licensing jurisdictions. This lack of regulatory transparency represents a significant concern for potential traders seeking properly oversighted brokers.
Specific information about funding methods, processing times, and associated fees was not detailed in available sources. This information gap makes it difficult to assess the broker's operational convenience for international clients.
Minimum deposit thresholds and account tier structures were not specified in the available documentation. This limits our ability to assess accessibility for different trader segments.
No specific promotional offers or bonus structures were mentioned in the available information sources.
Kawase offered trading across currencies, precious metals, stocks, indices, and oil. This asset diversity suggests a complete approach to CFD trading, though specific instrument counts and exotic options were not detailed.
Detailed information about spreads, commissions, overnight fees, and other trading costs was not available in the source materials. This makes cost comparison challenging in this Kawase review.
Specific leverage offerings and their variations across asset classes were not documented in available sources.
Trading platform specifications, including web-based, desktop, or mobile applications, were not detailed in the available information.
Specific information about restricted jurisdictions or regional limitations was not provided in source materials.
Multi-language support capabilities were not specified in available documentation.
The account conditions evaluation for Kawase faces significant limitations due to insufficient publicly available information. Without detailed specifications about account types, minimum deposit requirements, or tier structures, it becomes challenging to provide a complete assessment of the broker's accessibility and suitability for different trader segments.
Available sources do not detail whether Kawase offered multiple account tiers, such as basic, premium, or VIP accounts, which are standard in the industry. The absence of information about Islamic accounts, professional trader accounts, or other specialized offerings further limits our understanding of the broker's accommodation for diverse trading needs.
The account opening process, verification requirements, and documentation needs were not specified in available materials. This information gap represents a significant concern for potential clients who need to understand onboarding procedures and timeline expectations.
Without clear information about account maintenance fees, inactivity charges, or other account-related costs, traders cannot make informed decisions about the long-term viability of maintaining accounts with this broker. This Kawase review highlights the need for greater transparency in account condition disclosure.
The evaluation of trading tools and resources at Kawase is limited by available information about the platform's analytical and educational offerings. While the broker provided access to multiple asset classes including currencies, precious metals, stocks, indices, and oil, specific details about research tools, market analysis, and trading utilities were not documented in available sources.
Standard industry tools such as economic calendars, market news feeds, technical analysis indicators, or automated trading support were not specifically mentioned in the available information. This absence of detailed tool specifications makes it difficult to assess the platform's competitiveness in supporting informed trading decisions.
Educational resources, which are crucial for trader development, were not detailed in the available materials. The absence of information about webinars, tutorials, market analysis reports, or other learning materials suggests either limited offerings or insufficient documentation of available resources.
Research capabilities, including fundamental and technical analysis tools, were not specified. This limits our ability to evaluate the platform's support for complete market analysis and trading strategy development.
Customer service evaluation for Kawase benefits from some user feedback available through Trustpilot reviews, though detailed service information remains limited. The presence of customer reviews on Trustpilot indicates that the broker maintained some level of customer interaction and feedback collection, suggesting active customer service operations during its operational period.
However, specific information about customer service channels, such as live chat, email support, or telephone assistance, was not detailed in available sources. Response times, service hours, and resolution procedures were similarly not documented, making it difficult to assess service quality fully.
Multi-language support capabilities, which are crucial for international brokers, were not specified in available materials. This information gap is particularly relevant given Kawase's positioning as an international CFD broker serving diverse geographic markets.
The transition from Kawase to Fondex raises questions about continuity of customer service and support for existing clients. Specific details about this transition process were not available in the source materials.
The trading experience evaluation for Kawase faces significant challenges due to limited information about platform specifications, execution quality, and user interface design. Without detailed documentation of trading platforms, order types, or execution methods, it becomes difficult to assess the quality of the trading environment provided to users.
Platform stability, execution speed, and order processing capabilities were not specifically addressed in available sources. These technical aspects are crucial for trader satisfaction and successful strategy implementation, making their absence a notable gap in this Kawase review.
Mobile trading capabilities, which are increasingly important for modern traders, were not detailed in available information. The absence of specifications about mobile apps, responsive web platforms, or mobile-specific features limits our understanding of the broker's adaptation to contemporary trading preferences.
Advanced trading features such as one-click trading, automated strategies, or sophisticated order management tools were not documented. This makes it challenging to assess the platform's suitability for experienced traders requiring advanced functionality.
The trust and regulation assessment for Kawase reveals significant concerns due to the absence of clear regulatory information in available sources. Regulatory oversight is fundamental to broker credibility and client protection, making this information gap particularly problematic for potential users.
Without specific details about licensing authorities, regulatory compliance measures, or client fund protection schemes, it becomes impossible to verify the broker's adherence to industry standards and legal requirements. This lack of transparency raises questions about operational legitimacy and client security.
The transition from Kawase to Fondex, as mentioned in available sources, adds complexity to the regulatory assessment. The continuity of regulatory status, client protections, and operational permissions through this transition requires clarification that was not available in source materials.
Third-party verification of regulatory claims, audit reports, or industry certifications were not documented. This further limits the ability to establish trust credentials for the platform.
User experience evaluation for Kawase relies primarily on limited feedback sources, including Trustpilot reviews, though detailed user satisfaction data was not extensively available. The overall user experience assessment must consider the broker's transition to Fondex, which may have impacted client continuity and platform familiarity.
Interface design, navigation ease, and platform intuitiveness were not specifically addressed in available documentation. These factors significantly impact trader satisfaction and operational efficiency, making their absence notable in this evaluation.
Registration and account verification processes were not detailed, limiting understanding of the user onboarding experience. Smooth account setup procedures are crucial for positive initial user experiences and platform adoption.
Funding and withdrawal experiences, including process simplicity and transaction times, were not fully documented. This represents another gap in user experience assessment.
This Kawase review reveals a broker with limited publicly available information, creating challenges for complete evaluation. While Kawase was established in 2011 with principles of simplicity and flexibility, the lack of detailed operational information and the transition to Fondex raises questions about current status and service continuity.
The broker appears most suitable for traders seeking basic CFD access across multiple asset classes, though the absence of regulatory clarity and detailed service specifications limits its appeal for security-conscious investors. The main advantages include asset diversity and historical customer service presence, while significant disadvantages include information transparency gaps and unclear current operational status.
Potential users should conduct thorough independent verification of current operational status, regulatory compliance, and service availability before considering this platform for their trading activities.
FX Broker Capital Trading Markets Review