Search

Is SUSHI safe?

Rating Index

WikiFX Detection

Business

Influence E

License

No license

  

Is Sushi Safe or Scam?

  

Introduction

  Sushi, a relatively new player in the forex market, has garnered attention for its trading services. However, as with any trading platform, it is crucial for traders to carefully evaluate the credibility and safety of the broker they choose. The forex market is rife with scams and unregulated entities, making it essential for traders to conduct thorough research before committing their funds. This article aims to provide an objective analysis of Sushi, assessing its safety, legitimacy, and overall trustworthiness. Our investigation is based on a comprehensive review of various sources, including user testimonials, regulatory information, and industry comparisons.

  

Regulation and Legitimacy

  The regulatory status of a broker is a critical factor in determining its legitimacy and safety. Sushi, unfortunately, lacks any valid regulatory oversight, which raises significant concerns for potential investors. Below is a summary of Sushi's regulatory information:

Regulatory Authority License Number Regulatory Region Verification Status
None N/A N/A Unregulated

  The absence of regulatory oversight means that Sushi does not have to adhere to any financial standards or practices that protect traders. This lack of regulation is particularly concerning given the history of scams associated with unregulated brokers. Traders should be aware that without regulation, there is little recourse for recovering funds in the event of a dispute.

  

Company Background Investigation

  Sushi is operated by Sushi Global Investing Limited, a company that has not provided comprehensive details regarding its ownership structure or management team. Established in 2024, the broker claims to offer a range of trading instruments, including forex currency pairs, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. However, the lack of transparency about its operational history and the individuals behind the company raises red flags.

  The management team's background and professional experience are crucial in assessing the broker's credibility. Unfortunately, there is minimal information available, which adds to the uncertainty surrounding Sushi's legitimacy. A broker's transparency in disclosing its operational details is a vital indicator of its trustworthiness.

  

Trading Conditions Analysis

  Sushi's trading conditions are another area of concern. The platform imposes a minimum deposit requirement of $1,000, which is relatively high compared to industry standards. Additionally, the fee structure lacks clarity, with reports of unusual fees associated with withdrawals and account maintenance. Below is a comparison of Sushi's core trading costs against industry averages:

Fee Type Sushi Industry Average
Major Currency Pair Spread 0.1 pips 0.2 pips
Commission Model N/A Varies
Overnight Interest Range N/A 0.5% - 1.5%

  The lack of a clear commission model and the potential for hidden fees can lead to unexpected costs for traders. These factors contribute to the overall perception that Sushi may not be operating with the best interests of its clients at heart.

  

Client Fund Security

  The safety of client funds is paramount when choosing a trading platform. Sushi does not provide adequate information regarding its fund security measures. There are no indications of segregated accounts or investor protection policies in place, which are standard practices among reputable brokers. The absence of these protections raises concerns about the safety of traders' funds.

  Additionally, there have been allegations of embezzlement and fraudulent activities linked to Sushi. Reports from users indicate that they have faced difficulties in withdrawing their funds, with claims of being required to pay additional taxes before processing withdrawals. Such practices are often indicative of a scam, further questioning whether Sushi is safe for traders.

  

Customer Experience and Complaints

  Customer feedback is a vital aspect of assessing a broker's reliability. Many users have reported negative experiences with Sushi, highlighting issues such as withdrawal difficulties and unresponsive customer service. Below is a summary of common complaints and their severity:

Complaint Type Severity Company Response
Withdrawal Issues High Poor
Unresponsive Customer Service Medium Poor
Fraudulent Activity Claims High Unaddressed

  Typical cases include users being unable to withdraw funds for extended periods and being pressured to pay additional fees. These patterns suggest a concerning trend that potential traders should consider seriously.

  

Platform and Execution Quality

  The trading platform offered by Sushi is built on the MT5 framework, which is generally regarded as reliable. However, user reviews indicate that the platform may have stability issues, leading to concerns regarding order execution quality. Reports of slippage and rejected orders have surfaced, raising questions about whether Sushi is safe for executing trades.

  The potential for platform manipulation is another issue that traders must consider. Without regulatory oversight, there is little accountability for the broker's actions, and traders may find themselves at risk of unfair practices.

  

Risk Assessment

  Using Sushi as a trading platform comes with inherent risks. Below is a summary of key risk areas associated with this broker:

Risk Category Risk Level (Low/Medium/High) Brief Explanation
Regulatory Risk High No regulatory oversight
Financial Risk High Potential for hidden fees and scams
Operational Risk Medium Platform stability and execution issues

  To mitigate these risks, traders should approach Sushi with caution. It is advisable to only invest funds that one can afford to lose and to consider alternative, more reputable brokers with established track records.

  

Conclusion and Recommendations

  In conclusion, the evidence suggests that Sushi exhibits several characteristics commonly associated with scam brokers. The lack of regulatory oversight, transparency issues, and numerous user complaints indicate that potential traders should exercise extreme caution.

  For traders seeking a safer environment, it may be prudent to consider alternative brokers that are regulated and have demonstrated a commitment to client protection. Some reputable options include well-established firms with a proven track record in the forex market. Ultimately, whether Sushi is safe or a scam remains a significant concern that should not be overlooked by potential investors.

Is SUSHI a scam, or is it legit?

The latest exposure and evaluation content of SUSHI brokers.

Permanent billing method to prevent repeated withdrawals
I paid taxes at the time of withdrawal and was embezzled by an employee. After investigating the company, the conclusion is that the embezzlement fund of 2.9 million yen cannot be returned by 1 yen. In addition, an account decompression request will be made. It is said that the company will bear some defrosting funds, but it is a complete fraud. Permanent billing and non-withdrawal method
Unable to withdraw and a trading scam
i opened a foreign exchange account with Anand Koundal which was the previous name of Sushi Global Investing i deposited 250000 usd and traded foreign exchange market and made 8,623,372 usd . The problem started when I wanted to withdraw funds where they started asking me to deposit 200,000 usd . I said whatever the fees is deduct it from my gains and withdraw me the money . They said they cannot unfreeze my account unless i deposited 200,000 usd. Later they closed Anand Koundal Limited and said they upgraded my account and the new name is SUSHI Global investing limited. This needs to be raised with the authorities and regulators as several people are being scammed by these people on a daily basis . How
A tax embezzlement case is occurring
I want you to help me. At the time of withdrawal, the tax will be 2.9 million yen → The employee embezzles the tax and freezes the account → The company will not refund the embezzled tax of 1 yen. It is said that there is no choice but to be unlucky → In addition, the account freezing cost will be partially borne by the company, but it will be charged forever.
The account was locked after paying the tax
It is required to pay $25 million as the tax.
Suddenly I couldn't get in touch and couldn't withdraw
I was trading based on the information of the broker Roger introduced by a woman named Joanna, but suddenly both Joanna and Roger could not be contacted at the same time, and MT5 could not log in.
Do not withdraw money and do not return tax embezzlement case costs
An employee embezzled tax of 2.9 million yen. It is said that a part of the cost will be paid by the company, but an additional 500,000 yen will be requested for the account freezing cost. The cost of the tax embezzlement case of 2.9 million yen will not be repaid at all. If you think it is unfair, you will be told to prosecute. First of all, the tax embezzlement cost should be repaid to the customer. In addition, an account freeze fee of 500,000 yen will be requested. Unfreeze your account now and ask for withdrawals.

SUSHI latest industry rating score is 1.46, the higher the score the safer it is out of 10, the more regulatory licenses the more legitimate it is. 1.46 If the score is too low, there is a risk of being scammed, please pay attention to the choice to avoid.

SUSHI safe