Search

INTERGROUP Forex Broker provides real users with * positive reviews, * neutral reviews and 4 exposure review!

INTERGROUP Broker Review

1.54

WikiFX monitor

Business

Influence E

License

No license

INTERGROUP Review 4

Latest All(4) Exposure(4)
Exposure
Humbug

The current exchange rate of the deposit is 6.51. There are handling fees if you wanna withdraw funds. Severe slippage. I was cheated of $10,000

FX1377033262
2021-04-19
Exposure

I said I don’t want to be disturbed, they just hung up.

欢乐马7249
2021-01-29
Exposure
INTERGROUP

Only loss is allowed on this platform. As long as you make profits, it will make you lose by stopping loss. The agent names Meng Wenli. The daily slippage always leads to constant losses.

FX1377033262
2020-06-09
Exposure
Unable to withdraw in INTERGROUP

The withdrawal applied on April 6th is yet to be received. The customer service kept holding off.

略略略69447
2020-04-07

  

Intergroup 2025 Review: Everything You Need to Know

  

Executive Summary

  This comprehensive intergroup review examines a broker that operates with limited transparency regarding its regulatory status and trading conditions. Based on available information, Intergroup presents itself as a forex broker offering Meta Trader 4/5 trading platforms and claims to provide multiple trading instruments. However, the lack of detailed regulatory information and specific trading conditions raises concerns about the broker's overall credibility.

  The broker appears to target traders who prefer mainstream trading platforms. While Intergroup claims to offer favorable trading conditions and diverse trading tools, the absence of concrete details about account types, spreads, commissions, and regulatory oversight makes it challenging to provide a definitive assessment. This review maintains a neutral stance due to insufficient verifiable information about the broker's operations, regulatory compliance, and actual trading conditions.

  

Important Notice

  Due to the limited regulatory information available about Intergroup, potential differences may exist between regional entities and their respective regulatory frameworks. Traders should exercise caution and conduct additional due diligence before engaging with this broker. This evaluation is based primarily on available summary information, and the lack of comprehensive user reviews and empirical trading data limits the depth of analysis possible. The assessment provided should be considered preliminary, and traders are advised to seek additional verification of all claims made by the broker.

  

Rating Framework

Dimension Score Rating Basis
Account Conditions 5/10 No specific account condition details provided in available information
Tools and Resources 7/10 Offers MT4/MT5 platforms with claimed multiple trading instruments
Customer Service 5/10 No detailed customer service information available
Trading Experience 6/10 Platform support mentioned but specific trading experience details lacking
Trust and Reliability 4/10 Absence of clear regulatory information significantly impacts trust rating
User Experience 5/10 No user reviews or experience data available in source materials

  

Broker Overview

  Intergroup operates as a forex broker in the financial services sector. Specific establishment details and founding information are not readily available in the source materials. The company appears to have evolved into a diversified operating entity with interests extending beyond forex trading.

  According to available information, the organization has developed operations in multi-family and commercial real estate sectors. It maintains investment interests in the hospitality industry, including an investment in the Hilton San Francisco Financial District.

  The broker's business model suggests a multi-faceted approach to financial services. The primary focus on forex trading remains evident through their platform offerings. Intergroup claims to provide Meta Trader 4/5 trading platforms, which are industry-standard tools widely recognized by forex traders globally.

  The company's diversified portfolio suggests financial stability. However, specific details about trading operations, regulatory compliance, and service offerings require further verification. The broker's positioning indicates an attempt to serve traders seeking established platform solutions, though comprehensive service details remain limited in available documentation.

  

Detailed Information

  Regulatory Status: Available information does not specify regulatory jurisdictions or licensing details. This represents a significant concern for potential traders seeking regulated broker services.

  Deposit and Withdrawal Methods: Specific information about funding methods, processing times, and associated fees is not detailed in available source materials.

  Minimum Deposit Requirements: No specific minimum deposit amounts are mentioned in the available information. This makes it difficult to assess accessibility for different trader categories.

  Promotional Offers: Details regarding bonus structures, promotional campaigns, or special offers are not included in the source materials reviewed.

  Tradeable Assets: The broker claims to offer multiple trading instruments. However, specific asset categories, currency pairs, or other financial instruments are not detailed in available information.

  Cost Structure: Critical information about spreads, commissions, overnight fees, and other trading costs is not specified in the source materials. This makes cost comparison challenging.

  Leverage Options: No specific leverage ratios or margin requirements are mentioned in the available documentation.

  Platform Selection: The broker offers Meta Trader 4/5 trading platforms. These are established industry standards providing comprehensive trading functionality.

  Geographic Restrictions: Information about restricted countries or regional limitations is not specified in available materials.

  Customer Support Languages: No details about multilingual support or communication options are provided in the source documentation.

  This intergroup review highlights the significant information gaps that potential traders should consider when evaluating this broker option.

  

Detailed Rating Analysis

  

Account Conditions Analysis

  The evaluation of Intergroup's account conditions presents challenges due to limited available information. No specific details about account types, their distinctive features, or target user categories are provided in the source materials. This absence of information makes it difficult to assess whether the broker offers standard, premium, or specialized account options that typically differentiate modern forex brokers.

  Minimum deposit requirements are not specified in available documentation. Without this fundamental information, potential traders cannot determine if the broker caters to retail traders with smaller capital or focuses primarily on institutional clients. The account opening process, verification requirements, and time frames are similarly unspecified.

  Special account features such as Islamic accounts for Sharia-compliant trading, demo accounts for practice, or managed account options are not mentioned in the available information. This intergroup review cannot provide definitive guidance on account suitability without these essential details. The lack of transparency regarding account conditions significantly impacts the overall rating for this dimension, reflecting the need for potential clients to seek additional information directly from the broker before making any commitments.

  

Tools and Resources Analysis

  Intergroup's tools and resources offering centers around the provision of Meta Trader 4/5 trading platforms. This represents a solid foundation for forex trading operations. These platforms are industry standards that provide comprehensive charting capabilities, technical analysis tools, and automated trading support through Expert Advisors.

  The availability of both MT4 and MT5 suggests the broker recognizes different trader preferences and requirements. However, beyond platform availability, specific details about additional trading tools, research resources, and educational materials are not detailed in the available information. Modern forex brokers typically supplement platform offerings with market analysis, economic calendars, trading signals, and educational content to support trader development and decision-making.

  The absence of information about proprietary tools, third-party integrations, or specialized trading resources limits the assessment of the broker's comprehensive service offering. Research and analysis resources, which are crucial for informed trading decisions, are not specified in available materials. Educational resources, including webinars, tutorials, or market commentary, are similarly unmentioned.

  While the MT4/MT5 platform provision earns positive recognition, the overall tools and resources evaluation remains moderate due to insufficient information about supplementary offerings that enhance the trading experience.

  

Customer Service and Support Analysis

  Customer service evaluation for Intergroup faces significant limitations due to the absence of detailed support information in available materials. Essential elements such as available communication channels, response times, and service quality metrics are not specified, making comprehensive assessment challenging.

  The availability of customer support through multiple channels including phone, email, live chat, or social media platforms is not detailed in source materials. Response time commitments, which are crucial for active traders requiring timely assistance, are not mentioned. Service quality indicators such as customer satisfaction ratings, problem resolution efficiency, or support team expertise levels are similarly absent from available information.

  Multilingual support capabilities, which are important for international brokers serving diverse client bases, are not specified. Operating hours for customer support, including availability during major trading sessions or 24/7 coverage, are not detailed. The source materials mention that the company values customer opinions and customer service quality, but specific implementation details or service standards are not provided.

  Without concrete information about support infrastructure, training, or performance metrics, this customer service evaluation remains neutral. The lack of user feedback or testimonials regarding support experiences further limits the assessment. Potential traders should directly verify support capabilities and test responsiveness before committing to the broker's services.

  

Trading Experience Analysis

  The trading experience assessment for Intergroup relies primarily on the confirmed availability of Meta Trader 4/5 platforms. These provide established trading environments familiar to many forex traders. These platforms offer standard functionality including real-time quotes, order execution capabilities, and comprehensive charting tools that form the foundation of professional trading operations.

  However, critical aspects of trading experience such as platform stability, execution speed, and order processing quality are not detailed in available information. Slippage rates, requote frequency, and execution transparency metrics that significantly impact trading outcomes are not specified. The quality of price feeds, server reliability, and platform uptime statistics remain unverified.

  Mobile trading capabilities, which are essential for modern traders requiring flexibility, are not specifically addressed in the available materials. While MT4/MT5 platforms typically include mobile applications, broker-specific implementations and optimizations are not detailed. This intergroup review cannot verify the quality of mobile trading experiences or cross-platform synchronization capabilities.

  Advanced trading features such as one-click trading, partial position closures, or sophisticated order types are standard in MT4/MT5 but broker-specific configurations and limitations are not specified. The overall trading environment assessment remains moderate due to platform provision but lacks verification of implementation quality and performance standards that distinguish superior trading experiences.

  

Trust and Reliability Analysis

  Trust and reliability evaluation for Intergroup faces significant challenges due to the absence of clear regulatory information in available materials. Regulatory oversight is fundamental to broker credibility, providing legal frameworks for client protection, fund segregation, and operational standards. The lack of specified regulatory jurisdictions or licensing details represents a major concern for potential traders.

  Fund safety measures, including client money segregation, compensation schemes, and banking relationships, are not detailed in available information. These protections are essential for trader confidence and represent standard expectations for regulated brokers. Without verification of these safeguards, trust assessment remains limited.

  Company transparency regarding ownership, financial statements, and operational history is not evident in available materials. While the source mentions the company's evolution into diversified operations including real estate and hospitality investments, specific details about corporate structure and financial stability are not provided.

  Industry reputation, regulatory compliance history, and any negative incidents or regulatory actions are not addressed in available information. Third-party verification of claims, independent audits, or industry recognition are similarly absent. The lack of comprehensive regulatory and transparency information significantly impacts the trust rating, reflecting the need for potential clients to conduct extensive due diligence and seek additional verification before engaging with the broker's services.

  

User Experience Analysis

  User experience evaluation for Intergroup encounters substantial limitations due to the absence of user feedback, testimonials, or experience data in available source materials. Comprehensive user experience assessment typically relies on actual client experiences, satisfaction surveys, and community feedback that are not present in the available information.

  Interface design and usability aspects, while partially addressed through MT4/MT5 platform provision, lack specific details about broker customizations, user interface optimizations, or proprietary enhancements that could differentiate the user experience. Registration and verification processes, which significantly impact initial user experiences, are not detailed in available materials.

  Funding and withdrawal experiences, including process efficiency, documentation requirements, and transaction completion times, are not specified. These operational aspects significantly influence overall user satisfaction and broker perception. Common user complaints, frequently asked questions, or typical support issues that might indicate experience patterns are not available for analysis.

  User demographics, trading preferences, and satisfaction levels across different trader categories remain unspecified. The absence of user reviews, ratings, or community discussions limits the ability to assess real-world experiences or identify potential service issues. Without empirical user data or feedback mechanisms, this user experience evaluation remains neutral, emphasizing the importance of seeking current user perspectives and testing broker services through demo accounts before committing to live trading relationships.

  

Conclusion

  This comprehensive evaluation of Intergroup reveals a broker with limited publicly available information that raises concerns about transparency and regulatory compliance. While the broker offers established Meta Trader 4/5 trading platforms, the absence of detailed information about regulatory status, trading conditions, and service specifications makes it challenging to provide a strong recommendation.

  The broker appears most suitable for traders who prioritize access to mainstream trading platforms and are willing to conduct extensive independent verification of service claims. However, the lack of regulatory transparency and comprehensive service details suggests that more established, well-documented broker alternatives may be preferable for most traders.

  The primary advantages include platform availability and claimed diversified business operations. Significant disadvantages encompass the absence of regulatory information, limited service transparency, and insufficient user feedback data for verification.

INTERGROUP review