Business
License
Established in 2017, AMS is an Australian broker that has recently come under scrutiny due to its very low WikiFX score of 1.55/10, leading to significant concerns regarding its regulatory legitimacy and the safety of traders' funds. The brokers positioning primarily attracts beginner traders searching for low-cost forex and CFD trading options. However, the perceived savings come at considerable risk, particularly for inexperienced traders who may not fully understand the potential hazards presented by unregulated platforms.
The existing concerns about AMS include being flagged as a "suspicious clone" by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and the current inaccessibility of its official website. To date, numerous negative reviews have surfaced, indicating potential issues with fund withdrawal and safety. In light of these warnings, serious consideration is necessary for any trader contemplating dealings with AMS.
Trading with AMS carries significant risks. Take note of the following:
Steps to Self-Verify:
Dimension | Rating (out of 5) | Justification |
---|---|---|
Trustworthiness | 1 | Flagged as a "suspicious clone" by ASIC |
Trading Costs | 3 | Competitive fees but potential hidden charges reported |
Platforms & Tools | 2 | Basic trading platforms with limited tools compared to competitors |
User Experience | 2 | Accessibility issues with the main website affect user experience |
Customer Support | 2 | Limited languages and slow response times noted in user feedback |
Account Conditions | 2 | Unclear account conditions and possible withdrawal difficulties |
AMS, operating under Accumulus Capital Pty Ltd, was founded in 2017 and is based in Australia. The broker presents itself as a platform geared towards facilitating forex and CFD trading. However, the ambiguity surrounding its regulatory compliance and multiple red flags associated with its operations place its credibility into question. The existence of its dubious regulatory status raises alarm about its legitimacy in the ever-competitive brokerage landscape.
AMS offers trading in forex and CFDs, attempting to cater primarily to beginner traders looking for low-cost entry points into the market. The claimed regulatory oversight from ASIC—that is now doubted—combined with an offered range of trading instruments, including various asset classes like commodities and stocks, creates a facade of a well-structured trading environment. However, scrutiny reveals that the platform may lack the necessary regulatory backing to ensure fund safety and transparency in operations.
Feature | Details |
---|---|
Regulation | ASIC (currently flagged as clone) |
Minimum Deposit | Not clearly defined |
Leverage | Up to 1:500 |
Major Fees | Withdrawal fees potentially hidden |
Trading Platform | MT4, MT5 |
Customer Support Availability | Limited languages; response issues |
The trustworthiness of a broker is paramount for any trader. In the case of AMS, several key factors raise significant concerns.
The broker has been identified as a "suspicious clone" by ASIC, raising alarms about its regulatory standing. An analysis of their claimed licensing reveals inconsistencies that suggest AMS might be engaging in deceptive practices to appear legitimate. As a result, the risks of losing funds are considerably high for traders who may believe they are dealing with a reputable broker.
To self-verify the legitimacy of AMS, traders are advised to follow these steps:
Despite these available reference points, concerns about the broker's user feedback resound through its reputation within trading communities:
"Withdrawal processes are highly complicated, and responses from customer service are often delayed." — Anonymous user review from WikiFX.
Trading costs can often be a double-edged sword—while low commissions may be attractive, they can lead to unexpected expenses.
AMS does offer competitive commission structures that could benefit many beginner traders. Users appreciate that they can enter trades with low upfront costs. However, several complaints have pointed out non-trading fees that escalate during withdrawal and other processes.
"With fees reaching as high as $30 for withdrawals, the low commission promises quickly turn sour." — Anonymous user complaint.
While the low spreads can serve novice traders well, the unforeseen costs associated with withdrawals and potential inactivity fees present significant caveats that can detract from these benefits.
In summary, prospective traders must weigh the attractive costs against the lurking dangers of hidden fees.
AMS claims to provide the popular platforms MT4 and MT5, which are staple trading tools for many traders. However, its crucial to analyze their execution quality and additional features.
The platforms are indeed robust, offering a variety of tools for market analysis and algorithmic trading. However, user experiences suggest a lack of specialized resources, particularly for those who may be new to trading.
The limitations in available educational materials and market analytical tools prove to be insufficient for traders aiming to hone their skills effectively. User feedback indicates that:
"While MT4 and MT5 are excellent platforms, AMS fails to provide adequate resources for beginners." — Community feedback.
Thus, while the platforms are industry-standard, the additional support and resources needed for novice traders may fall short.
User experience is influenced significantly by the accessibility and functionality of the trading platform, as well as the quality of customer support.
In AMS's case, the highest complaints revolve around the inaccessibility of its website, which is critical for traders seeking essential information. Furthermore, negative experiences suggested:
"Getting answers to basic queries can take days—if responses are even received at all." — Anonymous feedback.
This unresponsiveness hampers the user experience for both beginner and experienced traders alike.
Customer support remains an essential pillar for any broker, especially for newcomers in the trading world.
AMS reportedly offers support in a limited number of languages, predominantly Chinese (simplified), thus alienating non-Chinese-speaking traders. Feedback indicates delays in response times, with traders waiting overly long for assistance with even the simplest inquiries.
Consequently, traders experienced a frustrating lack of support, underscoring the importance of reliable customer assistance in a field where timely information can be crucial.
The terms and conditions associated with opening an account can significantly impact a trader's experience and success.
Unfortunately, details surrounding the account conditions at AMS remain vague, with a notable lack of transparency in communications about minimum deposits or other essential requirements.
While some traders prefer flexibility, the absence of clear information from AMS on account conditions can lead to confusion and unexpected issues when trying to withdraw funds or close accounts. The ambiguity surrounding such critical information only heightens concerns regarding the overall reliability of the broker.
AMS represents a beguiling opportunity, primarily for novice traders searching for low-cost entry into forex and CFD markets. However, potential traders should heavily scrutinize the negative risk factors attached to this broker. Regulatory legitimacy, deposit safety, and overall transparency are significant concerns that overshadow potential savings on trading fees.
Careful consideration and due diligence are strongly advised. Traders looking for dependable brokerage services are recommended to explore more established options with proven regulatory compliance and user satisfaction. The potential for significant losses and complications suggests that engaging with AMS could well lead to attrition rather than successful trading outcomes.
FX Broker Capital Trading Markets Review