Regarding the legitimacy of {Element} forex brokers, it provides ASIC, FSA, FCA and WikiBit, .
Business
License
The regulatory license is the strongest proof.
ASIC Market Maker (MM)
Australia Securities & Investment Commission
Australia Securities & Investment Commission
Current Status:
License Type:
Market Maker (MM)Licensed Entity:
Effective Date: 53749
2011-11-09Email Address of Licensed Institution:
D.Ferguson@avatrade.com53748:
No SharingWebsite of Licensed Institution:
--Expiration Time:
--Address of Licensed Institution:
Phone Number of Licensed Institution:
1800206496Licensed Institution Certified Documents:
FSA Retail Forex License
Financial Services Agency
Financial Services Agency
Current Status:
License Type:
Retail Forex LicenseLicensed Entity:
Effective Date:
2007-09-30Email Address of Licensed Institution:
--53748:
No SharingWebsite of Licensed Institution:
--Expiration Time:
--Address of Licensed Institution:
Phone Number of Licensed Institution:
03-4577-8900Licensed Institution Certified Documents:
FCA European Authorized Representative (EEA)
Financial Conduct Authority
Financial Conduct Authority
Current Status:
License Type:
European Authorized Representative (EEA)Licensed Entity:
Effective Date:
2009-07-23Email Address of Licensed Institution:
--53748:
No SharingWebsite of Licensed Institution:
www.avatrade.comExpiration Time:
--Address of Licensed Institution:
Phone Number of Licensed Institution:
+353872033740Licensed Institution Certified Documents:
Element, a relatively new player in the forex market, has attracted attention for its claims of providing a wide range of trading instruments, including forex, precious metals, and cryptocurrencies. However, as with any financial service, it is crucial for traders to conduct thorough due diligence before engaging with a broker. The forex market is rife with scams, and the consequences of falling victim to one can be severe, including the loss of hard-earned funds. This article aims to assess whether Element is safe or a scam by examining its regulatory status, company background, trading conditions, customer fund security, and user experiences. The analysis is based on a review of various online sources, including expert opinions and user reviews.
The regulatory status of a forex broker is one of the most significant indicators of its legitimacy. Element claims to be regulated by multiple authorities, including ASIC in Australia, FCA in the UK, and FSA in Japan. However, a closer inspection reveals a troubling picture. Many sources label Element as a "suspicious clone" of legitimate brokers, indicating that it may not be regulated as it claims.
Regulatory Authority | License Number | Regulatory Region | Verification Status |
---|---|---|---|
ASIC | N/A | Australia | Suspicious Clone |
FCA | N/A | United Kingdom | Suspicious Clone |
FSA | N/A | Japan | Suspicious Clone |
The lack of genuine regulatory oversight raises red flags about the broker's reliability. In the absence of a legitimate license, traders are left unprotected and vulnerable to potential fraud. The importance of regulation cannot be overstated; it serves as a safety net for traders, ensuring that the broker adheres to industry standards and provides a level of investor protection.
Element was founded in 2023 and claims to be based in the United States. However, the lack of transparency regarding its ownership structure and management team raises concerns. There is little information available about the individuals behind the company, which is often a warning sign in the forex industry. Reliable brokers typically provide details about their management teams and their qualifications, fostering trust with potential clients.
Moreover, Element's official website has been reported as inaccessible at times, further compounding the issues surrounding its transparency. In an industry where trust is paramount, the inability to verify a company's background and ownership can lead to skepticism about its operations. Without a clear understanding of who runs the company and their qualifications, it becomes increasingly difficult to ascertain whether Element is safe or a scam.
When evaluating a forex broker, understanding the trading conditions they offer is essential. Element claims to offer competitive spreads and various trading instruments, but the specifics are often vague or missing altogether. This lack of clarity can be concerning for potential traders who rely on transparent information to make informed decisions.
Cost Type | Element | Industry Average |
---|---|---|
Major Currency Pair Spread | N/A | 0.5 - 1.5 pips |
Commission Model | N/A | Varies |
Overnight Interest Range | N/A | Varies |
The absence of detailed information about spreads, commissions, and overnight interest rates suggests a lack of transparency that can be detrimental to traders. If a broker does not clearly outline its fee structure, it may be attempting to hide unfavorable terms or additional costs that could eat into a trader's profits. This further supports the notion that prospective clients should approach Element with caution.
The security of customer funds is a critical aspect of any forex broker's operations. Element's website does not provide sufficient information regarding its fund protection measures. A reputable broker typically segregates client funds from its operational funds, ensuring that traders' money is safe even in the event of the broker's insolvency.
Additionally, investor protection schemes, such as those offered by regulated brokers, provide further security for traders. Unfortunately, Element does not appear to offer these protections, leaving clients vulnerable in case of financial issues. Historical complaints and issues related to fund security have also been reported, indicating a pattern of concern regarding the safety of client funds.
User feedback is invaluable when assessing a broker's reliability. Reviews of Element reveal a concerning trend of complaints from clients who have faced difficulties in withdrawing their funds. Many users have reported being unable to access their money, which is a significant red flag for any financial institution.
Complaint Type | Severity Level | Company Response |
---|---|---|
Withdrawal Issues | High | Poor |
Lack of Transparency | Medium | Minimal |
Customer Service Complaints | Medium | Slow |
Two notable case studies highlight the issues faced by clients. One user reported that after making a deposit, their account was blocked without explanation, preventing them from accessing their funds. Another client mentioned that the companys customer service was unresponsive when they attempted to resolve their withdrawal issues. These experiences suggest that Element may not prioritize customer support, further casting doubt on its legitimacy.
The trading platform offered by a broker is crucial for user experience and trading success. Element claims to provide access to the MT5 platform, which is known for its advanced features. However, numerous reports indicate that users have faced difficulties accessing the platform, with many experiencing technical issues that hindered their trading activities.
Additionally, the quality of order execution is a significant factor. Reports of slippage and high rejection rates raise concerns about whether traders can execute their trades effectively. If a broker manipulates prices or fails to execute orders promptly, it can lead to substantial financial losses for traders. The lack of transparency regarding these operational aspects further fuels skepticism about Element's reliability.
Engaging with Element entails a variety of risks that potential traders should consider. The absence of proper regulation, coupled with numerous client complaints, indicates a high-risk environment for trading.
Risk Category | Risk Level (Low/Medium/High) | Brief Explanation |
---|---|---|
Regulatory Risk | High | Unregulated status raises concerns. |
Fund Security Risk | High | Lack of segregation and protection measures. |
Customer Service Risk | Medium | Poor response to client issues. |
To mitigate these risks, potential traders should consider using regulated brokers with a proven track record. It is advisable to read user reviews, conduct thorough research, and ensure that any broker is transparent about its operations before committing funds.
In conclusion, the evidence suggests that Element poses significant risks to potential traders. The lack of genuine regulation, combined with numerous complaints regarding fund access and customer service, raises serious concerns about its legitimacy. While it may offer various trading instruments, the potential for loss and lack of protection makes it a risky proposition.
For traders seeking a reliable forex broker, it is essential to prioritize those with established regulatory oversight and positive user feedback. Reputable alternatives include brokers like IG, OANDA, and Forex.com, which have demonstrated a commitment to transparency and customer protection. As such, it is prudent for traders to exercise caution and thoroughly research any broker before investing their hard-earned money. Ultimately, the question remains: Is Element safe? Based on the available evidence, it is advisable to approach with caution or consider more reputable options.
Whether it is a legitimate broker to see if the market is regulated; start investing in Forex App whether it is safe or a scam, check whether there is a license.
Element latest industry rating score is 1.36, the higher the score the safer it is out of 10, the more regulatory licenses the more legitimate it is. 1.36 If the score is too low, there is a risk of being scammed, please pay attention to the choice to avoid.