Search

SFOCL Forex Broker provides real users with * positive reviews, * neutral reviews and * exposure review!

SFOCL Broker Review

1.42

WikiFX monitor

Business

Influence E

License

No license

SFOCL Review

Latest All

No comment yet

  

SFOCL 2025 Review: Everything You Need to Know

  SFOCL, a forex and commodities broker, has garnered mixed reviews from various sources. While it claims to offer competitive trading conditions and a wide range of financial instruments, there are significant concerns regarding its regulatory status and transparency. Notably, many reviews label it as "suspected fraud," which raises serious red flags for potential investors.

  Note: Its important to consider that SFOCL operates in different jurisdictions, which may affect its regulatory compliance. The information presented here is based on a comprehensive analysis of multiple sources to ensure fairness and accuracy.

  

Ratings Overview

Category Rating (out of 10)
Account Conditions 3
Tools and Resources 4
Customer Service and Support 3
Trading Setup (Experience) 4
Trustworthiness 2
User Experience 3
Regulatory Compliance 1

  Note: Ratings are based on aggregated data from various reviews and may vary by source.

  

How We Rate Brokers

  Our rating system evaluates brokers based on a combination of user feedback, expert opinions, and factual data regarding their services.

  

Broker Overview

  SFOCL, established in 2024, operates out of Denver, Colorado. It claims to provide a range of financial instruments, including CFDs on metals, energy, and commodities. However, it does not utilize popular trading platforms like MT4 or MT5; instead, it employs its proprietary trading software. This software is advertised as compatible with various devices, including desktops and mobile platforms, but lacks detailed user feedback.

  

Detailed Analysis

  •   Regulatory Regions: SFOCL claims to be regulated under the US MSB (Money Services Business) and the NFA (National Futures Association). However, multiple sources indicate that it is not actually regulated by the NFA, which raises concerns about its legitimacy.

  •   Deposit/Withdrawal Methods: SFOCL offers several deposit and withdrawal options, including cryptocurrencies, Neteller, Skrill, bank transfers, and Mastercard. However, the lack of clear information regarding fees associated with these methods is a concern.

  •   Minimum Deposit: The minimum deposit required to open an account is reported to be $1,000, which may be considered high compared to other brokers.

  •   Bonuses/Promotions: There is no clear information available regarding any bonuses or promotions offered by SFOCL, which could be a disadvantage for new traders looking for incentives.

  •   Asset Classes: SFOCL provides access to various asset classes, including forex, precious metals, and commodities like crude oil and agricultural products. However, the range of available trading instruments is not as extensive as some competing brokers.

  •   Costs (Spreads, Fees, Commissions): The official website does not disclose detailed information on spreads, trading commissions, or other costs, making it difficult for traders to assess the overall cost of trading.

  •   Leverage: SFOCL offers leverage of up to 400:1, which is quite high and may pose significant risks for inexperienced traders.

  •   Trading Platforms: As mentioned, SFOCL does not offer popular platforms like MT4 or MT5, opting instead for its proprietary software. This could limit the trading experience for users accustomed to more established platforms.

  •   Restricted Regions: There is no specific information regarding restricted regions, but the lack of regulation may imply that traders from certain jurisdictions should exercise caution.

  •   Available Customer Support Languages: SFOCL supports multiple languages, including English, Simplified Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, and Indonesian, which could be beneficial for a diverse clientele.

      

  

Ratings Breakdown

  •   Account Conditions (3/10): The high minimum deposit and unclear commission structure detract from the overall attractiveness of SFOCL's account offerings.

  •   Tools and Resources (4/10): While the proprietary trading software claims to be comprehensive, the lack of user reviews and comparisons to established platforms limits its perceived utility.

  •   Customer Service and Support (3/10): Contact information is limited to email support, and the lack of live chat or phone support may frustrate users seeking prompt assistance.

  •   Trading Setup (4/10): The trading experience is hampered by the absence of widely-used platforms, and user feedback on the proprietary software is scarce.

  •   Trustworthiness (2/10): The designation of "suspected fraud" by multiple sources significantly impacts the trustworthiness rating, indicating potential risks for investors.

  •   User Experience (3/10): Overall user experience appears to be negatively affected by transparency issues and the uncertain regulatory status of SFOCL.

  •   Regulatory Compliance (1/10): The claims of regulation by the NFA have been debunked, leading to a very low score in this critical area.

      

  

Detailed Breakdown

  •   Account Conditions: With a minimum deposit of $1,000, SFOCL's account conditions are not particularly appealing, especially for novice traders. The lack of clear information regarding fees and commissions further complicates the decision-making process for potential clients.

  •   Tools and Resources: The proprietary trading software claims to offer cross-device compatibility but lacks detailed reviews or third-party validation. This absence of user feedback makes it difficult to ascertain its effectiveness and reliability.

  •   Customer Service and Support: The only available contact method is email, which may not provide the immediate assistance that many traders require. This limitation could lead to dissatisfaction among users needing prompt support.

  •   Trading Setup (Experience): The trading experience is hindered by the absence of established platforms such as MT4 or MT5. This could deter traders who prefer the familiarity and features of these widely-used platforms.

  •   Trustworthiness: The repeated labeling of SFOCL as "suspected fraud" by various sources raises significant concerns about its legitimacy. Potential investors should approach with extreme caution.

  •   User Experience: The overall user experience is marred by transparency issues, particularly regarding fees and regulatory status. This lack of clarity may lead to frustration for users attempting to navigate the platform.

  •   Regulatory Compliance: The claims regarding regulation by the NFA have been challenged, leading to a very low score in this category. Investors should be wary of platforms that lack proper oversight.

  •   In conclusion, while SFOCL presents itself as a competitive broker in the forex and commodities market, serious concerns regarding its regulatory status, transparency, and overall trustworthiness cannot be overlooked. Potential investors are strongly advised to conduct thorough research and consider alternatives before committing funds to this broker.