Amius Forex Broker provides real users with * positive reviews, 1 neutral reviews and * exposure review!
Business
License
FCA Exceeded 
Their customer support staff talks nonsense. They induced me to make investments here, but did not provided any detailed solutions. I guess this is a fraudulent company, and I cut off the connection.
This comprehensive amius review examines a company that has been operating in the financial services sector for 5 to 10 years. The company specializes in risk management and hedging solutions. Amius positions itself as a provider of non-cleared over-the-counter financial derivative contracts, primarily serving commodity producers, industrial processors, and commodity traders through brokerage execution services.
According to available information, Amius operates from the United Kingdom but currently lacks regulatory oversight. This presents significant considerations for potential clients. User feedback indicates a mixed reception, with reviews ranging from positive to neutral, though some concerns have been raised regarding customer support quality. The company's primary focus on institutional clients in the commodities sector distinguishes it from traditional retail forex brokers.
While Amius offers specialized services in the derivatives market, potential clients should carefully consider the implications of engaging with an unregulated entity. This is particularly important given the complex nature of OTC derivative products and the inherent risks involved in such transactions.
This review is based on publicly available information and user feedback collected from various sources. Amius operates in the United Kingdom but currently lacks regulatory authorization from recognized financial authorities. Potential clients should exercise due diligence and consider the implications of working with an unregulated financial services provider.
The evaluation methodology employed in this analysis relies on available market information, user testimonials, and publicly accessible data. This review aims to provide objective market analysis while acknowledging the limitations imposed by the availability of comprehensive operational data. Readers should conduct their own research and consider seeking independent financial advice before making any decisions.
| Criteria | Score | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Account Conditions | N/A | Specific account information not detailed in available sources |
| Tools and Resources | N/A | Comprehensive tool specifications not mentioned in available materials |
| Customer Service and Support | 4/10 | User feedback indicates negative experiences with customer support |
| Trading Experience | N/A | Detailed trading experience information not available in sources |
| Trust and Reliability | 3/10 | Lack of regulatory oversight significantly impacts trustworthiness |
| User Experience | 5/10 | Mixed user feedback with both positive and neutral reviews reported |
Amius has established itself in the financial services industry over a period spanning 5 to 10 years. The company focuses specifically on providing risk management and hedging solutions to businesses operating in commodity-related sectors. The company's business model centers around serving commodity producers, industrial processors, and commodity traders who require sophisticated financial instruments to manage their exposure to price volatility and market risks.
The company's core offering revolves around providing brokerage execution services for non-cleared over-the-counter financial derivative contracts. This specialization positions Amius within a niche market segment that differs significantly from traditional retail forex brokers. Their services are primarily designed to meet the complex hedging requirements of commercial and industrial entities rather than individual retail traders.
According to their Order Execution Policy documentation, Amius handles client orders in financial instruments through direct market execution or by transmitting orders to other firms for execution on behalf of their clients. The company operates with specific protocols that require express client consent for transactions conducted outside regulated markets or multilateral trading facilities. This indicates a structured approach to order handling and client protection measures.
However, a significant consideration for potential clients is that Amius currently operates without regulatory authorization from recognized financial authorities. This status presents important implications for client protection and oversight that must be carefully evaluated by any entity considering their services.
Regulatory Status: Amius operates from the United Kingdom but currently lacks regulatory authorization from the Financial Conduct Authority or other recognized regulatory bodies. This unregulated status represents a significant consideration for potential clients evaluating the company's services.
Deposit and Withdrawal Methods: Specific information regarding deposit and withdrawal methods is not detailed in available sources. Potential clients would need to inquire directly with the company to understand available funding options and processing procedures.
Minimum Deposit Requirements: The available materials do not specify minimum deposit requirements for opening accounts with Amius. This information would need to be obtained through direct consultation with the company.
Promotional Offers: No specific information regarding bonus promotions or special offers is mentioned in the available sources. The company appears to focus on institutional services rather than retail-oriented promotional strategies.
Tradeable Assets: Amius specializes in providing non-cleared over-the-counter financial derivative contracts. The specific asset classes and instruments available are not comprehensively detailed in the available information. However, the focus appears to be on commodity-related derivatives given their target market.
Cost Structure: Detailed information regarding spreads, commissions, and other trading costs is not specified in the available materials. The pricing structure for their specialized OTC derivative services would require direct inquiry with the company.
Leverage Ratios: Specific leverage ratios offered by Amius are not mentioned in the available sources. This is consistent with their focus on institutional clients who may have different leverage requirements than retail traders.
Platform Options: The available information does not detail specific trading platforms offered by Amius. Given their specialized focus on OTC derivatives for institutional clients, their platform solutions may differ significantly from standard retail trading platforms.
Geographic Restrictions: Specific geographic restrictions or limitations are not detailed in the available sources. The company's UK base suggests primary focus on markets accessible from that jurisdiction.
Customer Service Languages: The available materials do not specify which languages are supported by Amius customer service teams.
This amius review reveals that while the company operates in a specialized market segment, many operational details require direct inquiry with the company for comprehensive understanding.
The available information regarding Amius account conditions is limited. This makes a comprehensive evaluation challenging. Unlike traditional retail forex brokers that typically offer multiple account tiers with varying features and minimum deposits, Amius appears to operate with a more bespoke approach given their focus on institutional clients in the commodity sector.
The company's specialization in serving commodity producers, industrial processors, and commodity traders suggests that account structures are likely customized to meet specific business requirements. This differs from standardized retail account models. This approach is typical for firms serving institutional clients who often require tailored solutions that address their unique risk management and hedging needs.
Without specific details about account types, minimum deposit requirements, or account opening procedures, potential clients would need to engage directly with Amius to understand the available options. The absence of readily available account information may reflect the company's institutional focus. In institutional services, account terms are typically negotiated based on individual client requirements and business relationships.
Given the specialized nature of OTC derivative services and the institutional client base, account conditions would likely involve more complex documentation and due diligence procedures compared to standard retail trading accounts. This amius review notes that the lack of detailed public information about account conditions is consistent with institutional service providers but may present challenges for potential clients seeking transparent comparison with other service providers.
The available information does not provide comprehensive details about the specific tools and resources offered by Amius to their clients. This limitation in available data makes it difficult to assess the quality and breadth of analytical tools, research resources, or educational materials that may be provided.
Given Amius's focus on serving commodity producers and industrial processors with OTC derivative solutions, it is reasonable to expect that their tools and resources would be specialized for risk management and hedging analysis. These would differ from traditional retail trading tools. Institutional clients typically require sophisticated analytical capabilities for assessing market risks, pricing derivatives, and managing complex hedging strategies.
The absence of detailed information about research and analysis resources, market commentary, or educational materials in the available sources suggests that such resources may be provided through direct client relationships. This differs from publicly accessible platforms. This approach is common among institutional service providers who often deliver customized analysis and market intelligence based on specific client needs and industry sectors.
Without specific details about automated trading support, API access, or integration capabilities with existing risk management systems, potential clients would need to inquire directly about technical resources and connectivity options. The specialized nature of OTC derivatives often requires robust technical infrastructure and integration capabilities that differ significantly from standard retail trading platforms.
User feedback regarding Amius customer service presents concerning insights that warrant careful consideration. According to available reviews, there are indications of negative experiences with customer support staff. One user specifically noted that "customer support staff talks nonsense," which suggests significant issues with service quality and professional competence.
The quality of customer service is particularly crucial for companies operating in the complex OTC derivatives market. In this market, clients require knowledgeable and responsive support for sophisticated financial instruments. Poor customer service can have serious implications when dealing with time-sensitive hedging decisions or resolving issues related to derivative contracts.
The available information does not specify the customer service channels available, response times, or hours of operation. For institutional clients dealing with commodity price volatility and time-sensitive risk management decisions, reliable and knowledgeable customer support is essential. The negative feedback regarding customer service quality raises questions about the company's ability to provide the level of support expected by institutional clients.
Without detailed information about multilingual support capabilities or specialized support teams for different market sectors, it is difficult to assess whether Amius has adequate resources to serve their target market effectively. The reported issues with customer service quality represent a significant concern that potential clients should investigate thoroughly before engaging with the company.
The available information does not provide sufficient detail to comprehensively evaluate the trading experience offered by Amius. Unlike retail forex brokers that typically provide extensive information about platform stability, execution speeds, and user interface features, Amius appears to operate with less publicly available information about their trading infrastructure.
Given the company's focus on OTC derivatives for institutional clients, the trading experience would likely differ significantly from standard retail trading platforms. Institutional clients typically require specialized execution capabilities, custom pricing mechanisms, and integration with existing risk management systems. These differ from user-friendly retail trading interfaces.
The absence of information about order execution quality, slippage rates, or requote frequency makes it difficult to assess the technical performance of Amius's execution services. For institutional clients dealing with large notional amounts in derivative contracts, execution quality and reliability are critical factors. These can significantly impact hedging effectiveness and cost management.
Without user feedback specifically addressing trading experience, platform stability, or mobile trading capabilities, potential clients would need to conduct thorough due diligence to understand the technical capabilities and limitations of Amius's trading infrastructure. This amius review notes that the lack of detailed trading experience information may reflect the institutional nature of the business but creates challenges for transparent evaluation.
The trust and reliability assessment of Amius reveals significant concerns that potential clients must carefully consider. The most prominent issue is the company's lack of regulatory authorization from recognized financial authorities. This is concerning despite operating in the United Kingdom where the Financial Conduct Authority provides comprehensive oversight of financial services firms.
Operating without regulatory oversight means that clients do not benefit from the investor protection schemes, compensation funds, and regulatory supervision that are typically associated with authorized financial services providers. This absence of regulatory protection is particularly concerning given the complex and high-risk nature of OTC derivative products that Amius specializes in providing.
The available information does not detail specific fund safety measures, segregation of client assets, or insurance arrangements that might provide alternative forms of client protection. Without regulatory requirements for capital adequacy, client money protection, or operational standards, potential clients bear increased counterparty risk when engaging with the company.
Company transparency appears limited based on the available information. There are minimal details about management structure, financial reporting, or corporate governance practices. The lack of comprehensive public information about the company's financial strength, operational procedures, and risk management practices further compounds the trust concerns associated with the unregulated status.
Third-party verification of the company's standing within the industry is limited. The available user feedback includes concerns about customer service quality that may indicate broader operational issues. The combination of regulatory absence and limited transparency creates a challenging environment for building trust with potential institutional clients who typically require high levels of due diligence and risk assessment.
The user experience analysis reveals a mixed picture based on the limited feedback available about Amius. According to available sources, user reviews include both positive and neutral feedback. This suggests that experiences with the company vary significantly among different clients.
One positive review indicates satisfaction with the company's services, with a user stating they were "pleasantly surprised" by their experience. However, this positive feedback is balanced by concerning reports about customer service quality, which significantly impacts overall user experience. The reported issues with customer support staff suggest that while some clients may find value in the company's core services, the support experience may detract from overall satisfaction.
The user base appears to be primarily institutional, consisting of commodity producers, industrial processors, and commodity traders who require specialized hedging solutions. This specialized focus means that user experience expectations and requirements likely differ from those of retail traders. There is greater emphasis on execution reliability, pricing accuracy, and professional service quality rather than user interface design or educational resources.
Without detailed information about account opening procedures, platform usability, or fund management processes, it is difficult to assess the operational aspects of user experience. The institutional nature of the business suggests that user interactions may be more relationship-driven and customized rather than self-service oriented.
The mixed nature of user feedback, combined with specific concerns about customer service quality, suggests that while Amius may provide valuable specialized services to some clients, the overall user experience may be inconsistent. Potential clients should carefully evaluate their specific needs and risk tolerance when considering the company's services. This is particularly important given the unregulated status and reported service quality issues.
This comprehensive amius review reveals a specialized financial services provider operating in the niche market of OTC derivatives for commodity-related businesses. While Amius has maintained operations for 5 to 10 years and serves a specific institutional client base, several significant factors require careful consideration by potential clients.
The company's lack of regulatory authorization represents the most substantial concern. This removes important client protections and oversight mechanisms typically associated with financial services providers. Combined with reported issues regarding customer service quality and limited transparency about operational details, these factors create a challenging risk profile for potential clients to evaluate.
Amius appears most suitable for experienced institutional clients in the commodity sector who understand the risks associated with unregulated OTC derivative providers. These clients must have robust internal risk management capabilities. The company's specialized focus on risk management and hedging solutions may provide value for businesses requiring customized derivative products, but clients must weigh these potential benefits against the inherent risks of working with an unregulated provider.
The main advantages include specialized expertise in commodity derivatives and institutional-focused services. The primary disadvantages encompass regulatory absence, customer service concerns, and limited operational transparency. Potential clients should conduct thorough due diligence and consider alternative regulated providers before making engagement decisions.
FX Broker Capital Trading Markets Review
