Invast 2025 Review: Everything You Need to Know
Executive Summary
This comprehensive invast review examines Invast Global (now operating as 26 Degrees). It's an Australian-regulated multi-asset prime brokerage established in 2013. As a subsidiary of the Invast Group, which has been operating since 1960, this broker offers a diverse range of trading instruments across multiple asset classes. The platform caters to sophisticated investors seeking access to forex, single stock CFDs, ETFs, global equities, futures, OTC instruments, and commodities. They provide these through professional-grade trading platforms including Iress Trader, Iress ViewPoint, Iress Pro, and Bloomberg EMSX.
With ASIC regulation and a minimum deposit requirement of US$5,000, Invast positions itself as a premium service provider. It targets medium to high-net-worth individuals interested in forex and CFD trading. However, user feedback indicates areas for improvement, with ratings suggesting mixed customer satisfaction levels. The broker's strength lies in its regulatory compliance and diverse asset offerings. Potential clients should carefully consider the higher entry barrier and service quality aspects before committing.
Important Notice
Regional Entity Differences: Invast operates under different regulatory frameworks across various jurisdictions. The information presented in this review primarily focuses on Invast Financial Services Pty Ltd, regulated by ASIC in Australia. Traders in different regions may encounter varying terms, conditions, and regulatory protections. It is essential to verify the specific regulatory status and offerings available in your jurisdiction before opening an account.
Review Methodology: This evaluation is based on publicly available information, regulatory filings, user feedback, and industry data current as of 2025. The analysis aims to provide an objective assessment while acknowledging that individual trading experiences may vary based on personal circumstances and market conditions.
Overall Rating Framework
Broker Overview
Invast Global emerged in 2013 as the Australian subsidiary of the established Invast Group. This financial services company has roots dating back to 1960. The company has since rebranded to 26 Degrees while maintaining its core focus on providing sophisticated trading solutions to the Australian and international markets. Operating as a multi-asset prime brokerage, Invast specializes in delivering institutional-grade trading infrastructure to retail and professional clients seeking exposure to global financial markets.
The broker's business model centers on providing access to diverse asset classes through professional trading platforms. It positions itself as a premium service provider in the competitive Australian brokerage landscape. With headquarters in Sydney, the company leverages its parent group's decades of financial market experience to offer comprehensive trading solutions that extend beyond traditional retail forex offerings.
According to available information, Invast offers access to multiple trading platforms including Iress Trader, Iress ViewPoint, Iress Pro, and Bloomberg EMSX. These platforms cater to different trader preferences and sophistication levels. The broker's asset coverage spans forex trading, single stock CFDs, ETFs, global equities, futures, OTC instruments, and commodities, providing clients with extensive diversification opportunities. Under ASIC regulation with license number ABN 48 162 400 035, the broker operates within Australia's robust regulatory framework, offering clients statutory protections and oversight.
Regulatory Jurisdiction: Invast Financial Services Pty Ltd operates under Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) authorization. It has registration number ABN 48 162 400 035, providing clients with protections under Australian financial services legislation.
Minimum Deposit Requirements: The broker maintains a minimum deposit threshold of US$5,000. This positions it in the premium segment of the retail trading market and potentially limits accessibility for smaller investors.
Available Trading Assets: Clients can access a comprehensive range of instruments including foreign exchange pairs, single stock contracts for difference, exchange-traded funds, global equity markets, futures contracts, over-the-counter instruments, and commodity markets.
Cost Structure: Specific information regarding spreads, commissions, and fee structures was not detailed in available sources. This represents a transparency gap that potential clients should address directly with the broker.
Leverage Ratios: The platform offers leverage of 1:30, aligning with regulatory requirements while providing moderate capital efficiency for traders. Some sources reference higher leverage ratios, requiring verification based on account type and jurisdiction.
Platform Options: Trading infrastructure includes professional-grade platforms such as Iress Trader, Iress ViewPoint, Iress Pro, and Bloomberg EMSX. These platforms cater to different levels of trading sophistication and institutional requirements.
Geographic Restrictions: Specific information regarding regional availability and restrictions was not comprehensively detailed in available materials. This requires direct confirmation from the broker.
Customer Support Languages: Language support options for customer service were not specified in the reviewed materials. This represents an information gap for international clients.
This invast review highlights the broker's positioning as a premium service provider. Several areas require additional transparency and clarification for prospective clients.
Detailed Scoring Analysis
Account Conditions Analysis (Score: 6/10)
The account structure at Invast reflects its positioning as a premium brokerage service. The US$5,000 minimum deposit requirement serves as both a strength and limitation. This threshold significantly exceeds industry averages for retail forex brokers, which typically range from $100 to $1,000, effectively filtering the client base toward more serious investors with substantial capital. While this approach may enhance the quality of the trading environment by attracting committed traders, it simultaneously excludes novice investors and those with limited initial capital.
The available information does not detail specific account tiers or variations in terms based on deposit levels. This suggests a more streamlined approach compared to brokers offering multiple account categories. The absence of detailed account feature descriptions, including potential benefits like dedicated account management or preferential pricing for higher-tier clients, represents a transparency gap that could impact client decision-making.
Furthermore, the lack of information regarding Islamic account options, demo account availability, or special features for different trader categories limits the comprehensive evaluation of account conditions. The high entry barrier, while potentially justified by the professional-grade services offered, may not align with the needs of developing traders or those seeking to test the platform before committing significant capital.
This invast review finds that while the account conditions reflect serious market positioning, the limited transparency and high barriers may restrict the broker's appeal to a broader trading community.
Invast demonstrates strong capabilities in providing professional-grade trading infrastructure. It offers access to multiple institutional-quality platforms including Iress Trader, Iress ViewPoint, Iress Pro, and Bloomberg EMSX. This diverse platform offering caters to different trading styles and sophistication levels, from retail-focused interfaces to institutional-grade terminals used by professional money managers and institutional traders.
The Iress platform suite represents a significant strength. These tools are widely recognized in the Australian financial services industry for their reliability, comprehensive market data, and advanced analytical capabilities. Bloomberg EMSX integration further enhances the offering, providing access to one of the most respected institutional trading networks globally. This combination suggests that Invast prioritizes serious traders who require professional-grade tools rather than simplified retail platforms.
However, the available information lacks detail regarding research resources, educational materials, market analysis offerings, or automated trading support. Many modern brokers provide comprehensive educational programs, daily market commentary, technical analysis tools, and algorithmic trading capabilities as standard features. The absence of detailed information about these supplementary resources represents a notable gap in the overall service assessment.
The multi-asset approach covering forex, CFDs, equities, futures, and commodities provides excellent diversification opportunities. The specific depth of coverage in each asset class requires further investigation. Overall, the platform infrastructure appears robust for experienced traders, but additional clarity on educational and analytical resources would strengthen the offering.
Customer Service and Support Analysis (Score: 5/10)
Customer service represents a significant concern for Invast. Available user ratings of 2.99 out of 5 indicate substantial dissatisfaction among the client base. This below-average rating suggests systemic issues with service quality, responsiveness, or problem resolution that potential clients should carefully consider before committing to the platform.
The available information does not specify the customer service channels offered, operating hours, or regional support availability. This makes it difficult to assess the accessibility and scope of support services. Modern traders typically expect multiple contact methods including phone support, live chat, email ticketing systems, and potentially social media engagement, along with extended or 24-hour availability given the global nature of financial markets.
Language support details are also absent from available materials. This could be particularly relevant for international clients or those operating across different time zones. The lack of transparency regarding service level agreements, response time commitments, or escalation procedures further compounds concerns about the support infrastructure.
Given the premium positioning and higher minimum deposits, clients would reasonably expect superior customer service compared to budget brokers. The poor user ratings suggest this expectation is not being met, potentially indicating understaffing, inadequate training, or systemic process issues. The absence of detailed information about service improvements or customer satisfaction initiatives suggests limited focus on addressing these concerns.
Trading Experience Analysis (Score: 6/10)
The trading experience at Invast appears to center on professional-grade platform access. The Iress and Bloomberg infrastructure provides institutional-quality execution capabilities. These platforms typically offer superior order management, advanced charting tools, and comprehensive market data compared to basic retail trading interfaces. The multi-asset approach allows for portfolio diversification within a single platform environment, potentially streamlining the trading workflow for active investors.
However, critical information regarding execution quality metrics remains unavailable. This includes details about spreads, slippage rates, requote frequency, or order fill statistics. These factors significantly impact the practical trading experience and overall profitability, particularly for active traders or those employing shorter-term strategies. The absence of this transparency represents a notable weakness in evaluating the platform's competitive position.
Mobile trading capabilities, which have become essential for modern traders, are not detailed in available materials. Given the increasing importance of mobile access for position monitoring and trade management, this information gap could indicate limited mobile functionality or insufficient emphasis on mobile user experience development.
The leverage offering of 1:30 aligns with regulatory requirements while providing moderate capital efficiency. Some traders may find this restrictive compared to offshore alternatives. The professional platform focus suggests the broker targets traders who prioritize execution quality and advanced tools over promotional features or simplified interfaces.
This invast review indicates that while the foundational trading infrastructure appears solid, the lack of transparency regarding execution metrics and mobile capabilities limits the comprehensive assessment of the trading experience.
Trust and Reliability Analysis (Score: 7/10)
Invast's regulatory foundation provides a solid trust framework through ASIC oversight. ASIC is one of the most respected financial regulators globally. The Australian regulatory environment offers comprehensive investor protections including segregated client funds, compensation schemes, and regular regulatory auditing. The license number ABN 48 162 400 035 can be independently verified through ASIC's public registers, confirming the broker's legitimate regulatory status.
The company's heritage through the Invast Group, established in 1960, provides additional credibility through decades of financial market operation. This longevity suggests institutional stability and experience navigating various market cycles, though the specific track record of the Australian subsidiary since 2013 represents a shorter operational history for direct evaluation.
However, available information does not detail specific client fund protection measures beyond standard regulatory requirements. These could include the use of tier-one banks for segregated accounts, additional insurance coverage, or enhanced security protocols. Transparency regarding the company's financial strength, such as capital adequacy ratios or credit ratings, is also absent from public materials.
The rebranding to 26 Degrees, while maintaining operational continuity, may create some confusion regarding corporate identity and could impact brand recognition in the market. The absence of notable industry awards or recognition, while not necessarily negative, provides fewer external validation points for prospective clients to consider.
Overall, the regulatory framework provides a strong foundation for trust. Additional transparency regarding operational safeguards and financial strength would enhance the reliability assessment.
User Experience Analysis (Score: 5/10)
User experience evaluation reveals concerning patterns. The 2.99 out of 5 rating indicates significant dissatisfaction among the client base. This below-average score suggests systematic issues affecting client satisfaction, though specific details about user complaints or experience pain points are not available in the reviewed materials.
The high minimum deposit requirement of US$5,000 may contribute to elevated expectations among clients. They reasonably anticipate premium service levels commensurate with their investment. When service delivery fails to meet these expectations, dissatisfaction tends to be more pronounced compared to budget service providers where expectations are naturally lower.
Information regarding the account opening process, verification procedures, funding methods, and withdrawal experiences is notably absent from available sources. These operational aspects significantly impact overall user satisfaction, particularly during the initial onboarding phase when first impressions are formed. The lack of transparency regarding processing times, required documentation, or potential complications could indicate process inefficiencies.
The absence of detailed user feedback regarding platform usability, educational resources, or ongoing account management suggests limited focus on user experience optimization. Modern traders expect intuitive interfaces, comprehensive support materials, and proactive account management, particularly when paying premium fees or meeting high minimum deposit requirements.
The limited available information about user demographics or satisfaction surveys indicates minimal emphasis on client feedback collection and analysis. This could explain the persistent service quality issues reflected in the poor ratings.
Conclusion
This comprehensive invast review reveals a broker positioned in the premium segment of the Australian trading market. It offers professional-grade infrastructure through ASIC regulation and institutional-quality platforms. Invast (26 Degrees) demonstrates clear strengths in regulatory compliance, platform sophistication, and multi-asset accessibility, making it potentially suitable for experienced traders with substantial capital and professional trading requirements.
However, significant concerns emerge regarding customer service quality, transparency in cost structures, and overall user satisfaction. The 2.99 out of 5 user rating represents a critical weakness that overshadows the platform's technical capabilities and regulatory standing. The high US$5,000 minimum deposit creates additional barriers for many potential clients while potentially raising service expectations that appear to be unmet.
The broker appears best suited for sophisticated investors who prioritize regulatory protection and professional trading tools over customer service excellence or cost transparency. Potential clients should carefully weigh the platform's institutional-grade infrastructure against the documented service quality concerns and consider whether the premium positioning aligns with their trading requirements and service expectations.
For traders considering Invast, direct engagement with customer service, thorough cost structure clarification, and careful evaluation of service level commitments are essential before committing significant capital to the platform.
