TACHAN Broker Review

　　

Tachan 2025 Review: Everything You Need to Know

　　

Summary

　　This tachan review gives you a complete look at TACHAN Brokers, a Taiwan-based securities company that started in 1988. The company works mainly in capital markets and focuses on securities trading, brokerage services, and underwriting business. TACHAN has been around since 1988, which shows the company is stable, but our review finds big gaps in information about rules and what users think.

　　TACHAN's business focuses on trading services. The company makes money through trading securities, funds, and bonds, plus they work with financial derivatives. They also help customers trade domestic and foreign securities, do margin trading, and subscribe to new shares. But we don't have clear details about their trading platforms, account rules, or licenses.

　　This review helps traders and investors who know something about financial markets. People looking for different trading services from an established company will find this useful. The company has a BBB+ rating with a stable outlook, which suggests they're financially stable, but the lack of clear regulatory information and few user reviews make it hard to fully evaluate them.

　　

Important Notice

　　This tachan review uses information we could find, and readers should know that TACHAN Brokers' regulatory information isn't clear. This might affect how much users trust them and their experience in different regions. The company's specific oversight, license details, and compliance standards aren't clearly shown in materials we can access.

　　Our review method uses public information, financial reports, and limited user feedback. Because we're missing key information about trading conditions, platform details, and customer service, this review might not show the complete trading experience. People thinking about using TACHAN should do more research and contact the company directly for current terms and conditions before they start trading.

　　

Rating Framework

Criteria	Score	Rationale
Account Conditions	3/10	Specific information about spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, and leverage not mentioned in available sources
Tools and Resources	4/10	Multiple trading services offered but specific trading platforms, tools, and asset classes not detailed
Customer Service	3/10	Limited user reviews and feedback available, making service reliability assessment difficult
Trading Experience	4/10	Trading platform stability and functionality not specifically mentioned, limiting comprehensive evaluation
Trust and Regulation	2/10	Specific regulatory information absent, potentially affecting user confidence
User Experience	3/10	Limited user reviews available, making overall customer satisfaction assessment challenging

　　

Broker Overview

　　TACHAN Securities Co. started in 1988 and has been in Taiwan's financial services sector for a long time. The company works as a full securities company with headquarters in Taiwan, and they focus on capital markets activities. Their main business includes trading securities, funds, and bonds, plus they work with financial derivatives. This trading approach helps them make money through their own trading activities, which can bring both opportunities and risks depending on market conditions.

　　The company does more than just trading for themselves. They offer brokerage services, including help with domestic and foreign securities trading, margin trading, new share subscriptions, and government share auctions. TACHAN also provides underwriting services, like planning for public offerings and listings, fund collection planning, and corporate wealth planning. According to financial information we found, Tachan has a BBB+ long-term rating with stable outlook, which suggests they're reasonably stable in the Taiwan market.

　　However, this tachan review shows important missing information about specific trading platforms and detailed asset offerings for regular traders. The company's regulatory oversight details aren't clearly shown in sources we can access, which might affect transparency expectations for international traders who want clear regulatory information.

　　

Detailed Information

　　Regulatory Regions: Available information doesn't specify which regulatory authorities oversee TACHAN's operations, though the company works within Taiwan's financial regulatory framework. Specific license numbers and regulatory compliance details aren't mentioned in documentation we can access.

　　Deposit and Withdrawal Methods: Specific information about available deposit and withdrawal methods, processing times, and fees isn't detailed in current sources. You need to contact the company directly for accurate information.

　　Minimum Deposit Requirements: Minimum deposit amounts for different account types aren't specified in available documentation. This makes it hard to assess accessibility for various trader categories.

　　Bonuses and Promotions: Current promotional offers, welcome bonuses, or trading incentives aren't mentioned in available sources. This suggests either no such programs exist or limited marketing of existing offers.

　　Tradeable Assets: While the company works in securities, funds, and bonds trading along with financial derivatives, specific details about forex pairs, commodities, indices, or cryptocurrencies for retail trading aren't clearly outlined.

　　Cost Structure: Detailed information about spreads, commissions, overnight fees, and other trading costs isn't provided in accessible sources. This makes cost comparison with other brokers challenging for potential users.

　　Leverage Ratios: Maximum leverage ratios offered for different asset classes and account types aren't specified in available documentation.

　　Platform Options: Specific trading platform offerings, including proprietary platforms or third-party solutions like MetaTrader, aren't detailed in current information sources.

　　Regional Restrictions: Geographic limitations or country-specific restrictions for account opening and trading services aren't mentioned in available materials.

　　Customer Support Languages: Available support languages and communication channels aren't specified in accessible documentation. Taiwan-based operations suggest Chinese language support though.

　　This tachan review highlights the need for direct communication with TACHAN to get comprehensive trading condition details not available in public documentation.

　　

Detailed Rating Analysis

　　

Account Conditions Analysis (3/10)

　　TACHAN's account conditions evaluation faces big limitations because there isn't enough publicly available information about specific account types and their features. Available sources don't detail different account tiers, their features, or minimum balance requirements, making it hard to assess how competitive the broker is in this area. The absence of information about account opening procedures, required documents, or verification timelines makes evaluation even more complicated for potential users.

　　Minimum deposit requirements across different account categories remain unspecified. This prevents assessment of accessibility for various trader segments. Without clear information about account-specific benefits, trading conditions, or special features, users can't make informed decisions about which account type might suit their trading needs. The lack of details about Islamic accounts or other specialized account options also limits appeal for specific user groups.

　　The company focuses on institutional-level services, including securities brokerage and proprietary trading, which suggests sophisticated account structures may exist. But retail trader account conditions remain unclear. This information gap significantly impacts the account conditions rating, as transparency in account offerings represents a fundamental aspect of broker evaluation. This tachan review emphasizes the importance of direct inquiry with TACHAN for current account condition details before making trading decisions.

　　

Tools and Resources Analysis (4/10)

　　TACHAN's tools and resources assessment shows a mixed picture based on available information. The company's involvement in securities trading, financial derivatives, and underwriting services suggests access to institutional-level tools and market resources, though specific retail trading tools aren't detailed in accessible documentation. The firm's long-standing market presence since 1988 indicates potential accumulated expertise and resource development, but specific trading tools, analytical resources, and platform capabilities remain unclear.

　　Research and analysis resources availability isn't specifically mentioned in current sources. The company's underwriting and consulting services suggest some analytical capabilities exist within the organization though. Educational resources for traders, including webinars, tutorials, or market analysis publications, aren't documented in available materials, potentially limiting value for less experienced traders seeking learning opportunities.

　　Automated trading support, including expert advisors, algorithmic trading capabilities, or API access, isn't mentioned in accessible information sources. The absence of specific trading platform details makes it difficult to assess advanced trading functionality or tool integration capabilities. While the company's comprehensive financial services suggest resource availability, the lack of specific retail trading tool information impacts the overall rating in this category.

　　

Customer Service and Support Analysis (3/10)

　　Customer service evaluation for TACHAN faces significant challenges because there's limited available information about support channels, response times, and service quality metrics. Available sources don't specify customer support availability hours, communication channels such as live chat, phone support, or email response systems, making it difficult to assess support accessibility for users across different time zones.

　　Response time expectations and service level agreements aren't documented in accessible materials. This prevents assessment of support efficiency. The quality of customer service interactions, problem resolution capabilities, and staff expertise levels can't be evaluated based on current information availability. Multi-language support capabilities, while potentially including Chinese given the Taiwan base, aren't specifically confirmed for international users.

　　Customer service hours and availability during market sessions remain unspecified, which could impact traders requiring immediate assistance during active trading periods. The absence of user feedback about customer service experiences in available sources further limits comprehensive evaluation of support quality and reliability. Without documented customer service policies or user testimonials, assessing the broker's commitment to customer support becomes challenging, resulting in a conservative rating for this critical service area.

　　

Trading Experience Analysis (4/10)

　　Trading experience evaluation for TACHAN encounters substantial limitations because there isn't enough information about platform stability, execution speed, and overall trading environment quality. Available sources don't provide specific details about trading platform options, whether proprietary or third-party solutions like MetaTrader, making it impossible to assess platform functionality and user interface quality comprehensively.

　　Order execution quality, including execution speed, slippage rates, and order fill reliability, isn't documented in accessible materials. Platform stability during high-volatility periods and system uptime statistics aren't available, preventing assessment of technical reliability crucial for active traders. The absence of information about platform features, charting capabilities, and analytical tools integrated within the trading environment further limits evaluation.

　　Mobile trading experience, including app availability, functionality, and synchronization with desktop platforms, isn't mentioned in current sources. Trading environment factors such as market depth visibility, order types available, and advanced trading features remain unspecified. Without user feedback about actual trading experiences, platform performance, or technical issues, comprehensive trading experience assessment becomes challenging.

　　This tachan review emphasizes that the trading experience rating reflects information limitations rather than confirmed platform deficiencies. This highlights the need for platform demonstrations or trial accounts to properly evaluate TACHAN's trading environment quality.

　　

Trust and Regulation Analysis (2/10)

　　Trust and regulation assessment for TACHAN reveals significant concerns regarding transparency and regulatory clarity. Available information doesn't specify particular regulatory authorities supervising the company's operations or provide license numbers for verification, creating uncertainty about regulatory oversight and compliance standards. While the company operates within Taiwan's financial regulatory framework, specific regulatory body supervision details aren't clearly documented.

　　Fund safety measures, including client fund segregation, deposit insurance coverage, or investor protection schemes, aren't detailed in accessible sources. The absence of clear regulatory information makes it difficult to assess client protection levels and fund security arrangements, which represents a fundamental concern for potential users evaluating broker trustworthiness.

　　Company transparency regarding ownership structure, financial reporting, and operational procedures is limited in publicly available materials. Industry reputation and recognition from financial authorities or industry bodies aren't documented, preventing assessment of peer recognition and professional standing. The handling of negative events, complaints, or regulatory actions isn't addressed in available sources.

　　The lack of third-party regulatory verification and limited transparency about compliance standards significantly impacts the trust rating. Without clear regulatory credentials and transparent operational information, users face uncertainty about protection levels and recourse options, resulting in a low trust and regulation score.

　　

User Experience Analysis (3/10)

　　User experience evaluation for TACHAN faces substantial challenges because there's limited user feedback and review availability in accessible sources. Overall user satisfaction levels can't be accurately assessed without comprehensive user testimonials, ratings, or experience reports from actual clients. The absence of detailed user feedback prevents understanding of common user experiences and satisfaction patterns.

　　Interface design and platform usability assessment is hindered by lack of specific information about trading platform options and user interface characteristics. Registration and account verification process experiences aren't documented in available sources, making it impossible to evaluate onboarding efficiency and user-friendliness of account setup procedures.

　　Fund operation experiences, including deposit and withdrawal processes, processing times, and user satisfaction with payment procedures, aren't detailed in current materials. Common user complaints or frequently reported issues aren't documented, preventing identification of potential problem areas or user satisfaction challenges.

　　User demographic analysis and typical client profiles aren't available in accessible sources. This limits understanding of the broker's target audience and user base characteristics. The lack of comprehensive user feedback compilation and improvement recommendations based on user experiences further impacts the user experience rating, resulting in a conservative assessment reflecting information limitations rather than confirmed service deficiencies.

　　

Conclusion

　　This tachan review reveals that TACHAN Brokers faces significant challenges in transparency and information accessibility that impact its overall evaluation and potential user appeal. While the company started in 1988, which shows institutional longevity, and its BBB+ rating suggests financial stability, the substantial information gaps regarding regulatory oversight, trading conditions, and user experiences create uncertainty for potential clients seeking comprehensive broker evaluation.

　　The broker appears most suitable for experienced investors familiar with Taiwan's financial market environment and comfortable with conducting extensive research before engagement. Traders seeking transparent regulatory information, detailed trading conditions, and comprehensive platform documentation may find TACHAN's current information accessibility challenging for informed decision-making.

　　The primary advantages include the company's long-standing market presence and involvement in diverse financial services. Significant disadvantages include limited regulatory transparency and insufficient publicly available information about trading conditions and user experiences. Potential users should prioritize direct communication with TACHAN to obtain current, detailed information about services and conditions before making trading commitments.