75 Markets Forex Broker provides real users with * positive reviews, 1 neutral reviews and * exposure review!
Business
License
ASIC Unverified 
I've been with 75 Markets only a couple of months with no issues so far. As a matter of fact the execution and spreads are excellent. The only thing I hope they would improve on is the 24 hour delay with withdrawals other than bank wire. It would great to have instant or same day withdrawals on Neteller and Webmoney at least.
75 Markets has become a controversial figure in the forex trading world. This 75 markets review shows major concerns about whether the company is legitimate and how it operates its business practices.
The broker says it works under ASIC regulation, but many industry sources and user reports suggest it may be operating without proper licenses. The platform offers basic web-based trading with access to forex and CFD markets, and it targets cost-conscious beginners who want simple market access. However, most user feedback and market analysis shows big risks with this broker.
WikiBit and other regulatory monitoring services report that 75 Markets claims ASIC oversight, but checking this regulatory status remains difficult. User reviews always highlight problems with service quality, platform reliability, and most importantly, concerns about fund security that could affect their investments. The broker lacks transparency about company background, specific account conditions, and how it operates, which raises red flags for potential investors who want reliable information. Despite potentially attractive low-cost entry points, the risk-to-benefit ratio appears heavily skewed against traders, making 75 Markets unsuitable for most retail investors seeking reliable trading environments.
This comprehensive 75 markets review acknowledges that regulatory landscapes and broker operations can vary significantly across different jurisdictions. The information here reflects available data from various sources, including user feedback, regulatory databases, and industry monitoring services that track broker performance. Potential clients should conduct thorough research and verify current regulatory status independently before engaging with any trading platform.
Our evaluation method combines user testimonials, regulatory verification attempts, platform functionality assessments, and comparative analysis with established industry standards. Given the disputed nature of 75 Markets' regulatory claims and the mostly negative user feedback, this review aims to provide traders with essential information to make informed decisions about their trading platform selection.
| Evaluation Criteria | Score | Rating Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Account Conditions | 2/10 | Lack of transparency regarding account types, minimum deposits, and terms |
| Tools and Resources | 4/10 | Basic platform functionality insufficient compared to industry standards |
| Customer Service | 3/10 | Poor user feedback on support quality and response times |
| Trading Experience | 4/10 | Platform stability issues and negative user experiences reported |
| Trust and Safety | 1/10 | Disputed regulatory status and multiple fraud warnings |
| User Experience | 3/10 | Overall dissatisfaction expressed by user community |
75 Markets operates in the competitive forex and CFD trading space. Specific details about when it started and its corporate background remain unclear from available documentation that we could access. The broker's business model appears to focus on providing basic trading access to retail clients, particularly those seeking entry-level trading opportunities that don't require large investments. However, the lack of comprehensive company information raises immediate concerns about transparency and accountability that potential clients should consider.
The platform uses web-based trading technology rather than industry-standard platforms like MetaTrader 4 or 5. This may limit functionality for experienced traders who need advanced features and tools for their trading strategies. According to available information from WikiBit and regulatory monitoring services, 75 Markets claims to offer forex and CFD trading services under purported ASIC regulation that should protect client funds. However, this 75 markets review must emphasize that multiple sources question the validity of these regulatory claims, with some explicitly listing the broker among potentially fraudulent operators.
The broker's target demographic appears to be novice traders attracted by promises of low-cost trading and simplified market access. Unfortunately, the combination of questionable regulatory status, limited platform capabilities, and poor user feedback suggests that even beginners would be better served by established, properly regulated alternatives in the current market environment.
Regulatory Status: 75 Markets claims operation under Australian ASIC regulation, but verification through official channels has proven problematic. Multiple industry watchdogs have flagged discrepancies in the broker's regulatory claims that raise serious concerns.
Deposit and Withdrawal Methods: Specific information about funding options remains undisclosed in available documentation. This represents a significant transparency gap for potential clients who need to understand how they can fund their accounts.
Minimum Deposit Requirements: The broker has not clearly specified minimum deposit amounts. This makes it difficult for traders to assess entry barriers and account accessibility before they decide to open accounts.
Promotional Offers: No specific bonus or promotional programs have been identified in available materials. This may reflect limited marketing transparency rather than absence of offers that could benefit new clients.
Trading Assets: The platform primarily focuses on forex currency pairs and CFD instruments. The exact range of available assets has not been comprehensively detailed in accessible sources that we could review.
Cost Structure: Fee schedules, spread information, and commission structures remain largely undisclosed. This creates uncertainty about true trading costs and potential hidden charges that could impact profitability for active traders.
Leverage Options: Maximum leverage ratios and risk management parameters have not been clearly specified in available documentation. This information is crucial for traders to understand their potential exposure and risk levels.
Platform Technology: The broker utilizes basic web-based trading interfaces rather than established industry platforms. This potentially limits advanced trading functionality and analytical tools that professional traders typically require.
Geographic Restrictions: Specific jurisdictional limitations and service availability by region remain unclear from current information sources. Traders need to understand where the broker can legally operate and provide services.
Customer Support Languages: Available support languages and communication channels have not been clearly specified. This 75 markets review notes generally poor feedback regarding customer service quality across all communication methods.
The account structure at 75 Markets presents significant transparency issues that should concern potential traders. Unlike established brokers who clearly outline different account tiers, minimum deposits, and specific features, 75 Markets provides limited information about its account offerings that clients can access. This lack of clarity makes it difficult for traders to understand what they're signing up for and what services they can expect from their trading experience.
User feedback consistently indicates dissatisfaction with account conditions, though specific complaints often focus more on service delivery than account structure itself. The absence of detailed account documentation, clear fee schedules, and transparent terms and conditions represents a major departure from industry standards that protect clients. Most reputable brokers provide comprehensive account information including Islamic account options, different trading conditions for various client types, and clear upgrade pathways.
The account opening process appears to lack the robust verification and documentation procedures typically required by properly regulated brokers. This might initially seem convenient for traders seeking quick market access, but it raises serious questions about compliance with anti-money laundering regulations and client protection standards that are legally required. When compared to established brokers who maintain clear account hierarchies and transparent pricing structures, 75 Markets falls significantly short of industry expectations, earning its low rating in this 75 markets review category.
The trading tools and resources available through 75 Markets reflect the platform's basic approach to market access. They fall well short of contemporary industry standards that traders expect from modern brokers. The web-based platform lacks the sophisticated charting capabilities, technical indicators, and analytical tools that traders have come to expect from modern trading environments that support professional analysis. Unlike established brokers who offer comprehensive market research, economic calendars, and educational resources, 75 Markets appears to provide minimal support for trader development and market analysis.
User feedback indicates frustration with the platform's limited functionality, particularly regarding order management, chart analysis, and automated trading capabilities. The absence of popular trading platforms like MetaTrader 4 or 5 means traders cannot access the extensive ecosystem of expert advisors, custom indicators, and third-party tools that enhance trading efficiency for both beginners and professionals. This limitation particularly impacts experienced traders who rely on advanced technical analysis and automated trading strategies.
Educational resources, market commentary, and research materials appear to be either absent or inadequately developed compared to industry leaders. Professional traders typically require access to fundamental analysis, market news feeds, economic data releases, and expert commentary to make informed trading decisions that can improve their performance. The lack of these resources suggests 75 Markets may not be suitable for serious traders seeking comprehensive market insights and professional-grade trading support.
Customer service represents one of the most critical weaknesses identified in this 75 markets review. User feedback consistently highlights poor support experiences that fail to meet basic professional standards. Response times appear to be lengthy, and the quality of assistance provided fails to meet basic industry standards that clients expect from legitimate brokers. Unlike established brokers who maintain multiple support channels including live chat, phone support, and comprehensive FAQ sections, 75 Markets appears to offer limited customer service options.
User testimonials frequently mention difficulties in reaching support representatives and inadequate resolution of technical or account-related issues. The lack of clear communication channels and published support hours creates additional frustration for traders who may need urgent assistance during active trading sessions when markets are moving quickly. Professional traders require reliable support infrastructure, particularly when dealing with platform issues or account problems that could impact open positions.
The absence of multilingual support options and specialized technical assistance further limits the broker's appeal to international clients. Most reputable brokers invest heavily in customer support infrastructure, recognizing that quality service delivery is essential for client retention and regulatory compliance that builds long-term business relationships. The consistently negative feedback regarding 75 Markets' customer service suggests fundamental deficiencies in this critical operational area that significantly impact overall user experience and satisfaction.
The trading experience provided by 75 Markets has received predominantly negative feedback from users. Particular concerns focus on platform stability and execution quality that directly affect trading results. Unlike established brokers who invest in robust trading infrastructure and advanced order management systems, 75 Markets appears to struggle with basic platform reliability that traders need for consistent performance. User reports indicate frequent technical issues, slow order execution, and problems with platform connectivity during active trading sessions.
The web-based platform's limitations become particularly apparent when compared to industry-standard solutions like MetaTrader platforms or proprietary systems offered by major brokers. Traders report difficulties with chart analysis, limited order types, and inadequate risk management tools that are essential for protecting their investments and managing trading positions effectively. The absence of mobile trading applications or downloadable platform options further restricts trading flexibility and market access for active traders.
Order execution quality represents another significant concern, with users reporting issues including slippage, delayed fills, and problems with stop-loss and take-profit orders. Professional trading requires precise execution and reliable platform performance, particularly during volatile market conditions when quick decisions and fast execution can make the difference between profit and loss. The negative user feedback regarding trading experience, combined with platform limitations, contributes to the low rating assigned in this 75 markets review category and suggests traders would benefit from considering more established alternatives.
Trust and safety concerns represent the most serious issues identified in this comprehensive evaluation of 75 Markets. The broker's claimed ASIC regulation has been questioned by multiple industry monitoring services, with some sources explicitly flagging the company as potentially operating without proper authorization that protects client funds. This regulatory uncertainty creates fundamental concerns about client fund protection and operational oversight that are essential for safe trading.
The lack of transparency regarding company ownership, operational history, and corporate structure raises additional red flags for potential clients. Established brokers typically provide detailed company information, regulatory documentation, and clear fund segregation policies to ensure client protection and demonstrate their commitment to regulatory compliance. The absence of such transparency at 75 Markets suggests potential compliance issues and inadequate client safeguards.
Multiple industry sources and user reviews have categorized 75 Markets among brokers to avoid, citing concerns about fund security and withdrawal difficulties. The combination of disputed regulatory status, limited company transparency, and negative user experiences creates a risk profile that makes the broker unsuitable for most retail traders who need reliable fund protection. When regulatory compliance and client protection are paramount concerns for serious traders, the trust and safety issues surrounding 75 Markets represent deal-breaking deficiencies that cannot be overlooked.
Overall user satisfaction with 75 Markets remains consistently low across multiple evaluation criteria. Traders express disappointment in virtually every aspect of the service offering that affects their daily trading activities. The combination of platform limitations, poor customer support, and regulatory concerns creates a user experience that falls well below industry standards that clients expect from legitimate brokers. Unlike established brokers who prioritize user satisfaction through comprehensive service delivery, 75 Markets appears to struggle with basic operational requirements.
The registration and verification process, while potentially streamlined, lacks the robust security measures typically implemented by properly regulated brokers. This might initially appear convenient, but it raises questions about compliance standards and client protection protocols that are legally required for legitimate operations. User feedback indicates that the apparent simplicity of account opening is quickly overshadowed by difficulties with platform functionality and customer support.
Common user complaints center on platform reliability, customer service responsiveness, and concerns about fund security. The predominantly negative feedback from the trading community suggests systematic issues rather than isolated problems that could be easily fixed with minor improvements. Most concerning are reports questioning the broker's legitimacy and recommendations to avoid the platform entirely. For traders seeking reliable, professional trading environments, the user experience at 75 Markets represents a significant departure from industry expectations and standards.
This comprehensive 75 markets review reveals significant concerns that make the broker unsuitable for most retail traders. The combination of disputed regulatory status, limited platform functionality, poor customer service, and overwhelming negative user feedback creates a risk profile that outweighs any potential benefits that might initially attract new traders. While the broker may appear to offer low-cost market access, the fundamental issues surrounding trust, safety, and operational reliability make it an inappropriate choice for serious traders.
The broker might only be considered by extremely risk-tolerant individuals who fully understand the potential for total loss and have thoroughly researched the regulatory implications in their jurisdiction. However, given the abundance of properly regulated, well-established alternatives in the current market, there appears to be little justification for accepting the risks associated with 75 Markets that could result in significant financial losses. The primary disadvantages including questionable legitimacy, poor service quality, and platform limitations far outweigh the limited advantages of potentially low entry barriers.
FX Broker Capital Trading Markets Review
