Conclusion: The FX market's scale hides a post-trade weakness: $1.4 trillion a day was still settled bilaterally without risk mitigation in the BIS 2025 survey. The hook is simple—an executed trade is not finished until both currencies arrive.
| April 2025 method | Daily amount | Risk status |
|---|---|---|
| Payment versus payment | $5.2tn (36%) | Eliminates principal risk |
| Netting/intragroup/timing controls | $7.6tn (54%) | Mitigates, does not eliminate |
| Gross bilateral | $1.4tn (10%) | Fully exposed |
Payment-versus-payment (PvP) coordinates the two currency legs so one is delivered only if the other is delivered. The BIS says access, currency-pair eligibility and trade-type eligibility help explain why some obligations remain outside PvP.
For banks and institutions, best execution is only one control layer. Counterparty limits, confirmation, netting, settlement instructions and fail monitoring also matter. For readers, the key distinction is:
Turnover measures trading activity; settlement data measure how obligations are completed.
The BIS also reported that settlement fails were only 0.01% of gross obligations in the survey month. Low frequency does not remove the potentially large principal exposure of a failure.
Published June 15, 2026. X and Google News were screened for current relevance; the analysis relies on BIS methodology and data.